Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2025
The C-seal: A Biofragmentable Drain Protecting the Stapled Colorectal Anastomosis from Leakage
Published on: November 4, 2010
Global Strategies for Postoperative Care and Bowel Management in Patients With Anorectal Malformations: Varied
Elizaveta Bokova1, Ismael Elhalaby2, Wendy Jo Svetanoff1
1Comprehensive Colorectal Center, Section of Colorectal and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, 64108, USA.
Background:
Anorectal malformations (ARMs) commonly result in constipation and fecal incontinence following primary surgical reconstruction. This study investigates global variations in postoperative care and resources.
Methods:
A survey was distributed via the International Pediatric Endosurgery Group (IPEG) and snowball sampling. Geographically, respondents were categorized into high-income countries (HICs) and low-or middle-income countries (LMICs).
Results:
233 surveys were received, 64% from LMICs and 36% from HICs. Of these, 51% reported monitoring ARM patients for over a year, while 23% utilized digital technologies. Access to anesthesia for anorectal exams was available to 70% of respondents. Only 29% had established a one-week Bowel Management Program (BMP). Collaboration with urologists and gynecologists was more prevalent in HICs (59%) compared to LMICs (37%, p < 0.01). In HICs, nurses and advanced practice providers were significantly more involved in BMP (71% vs. 39% in LMICs; p < 0.01), and abdominal radiographs for regimen adjustments were used more frequently (80% vs. 69% in LMICs; p = 0.03). Treatment regimens were more varied in HICs, and quality of life tracking was more consistent (19% vs. 9% in LMICs; p = 0.02). LMICs reported significant shortages of medications and equipment (75% vs. 58% in HICs; p = 0.01), inadequate sanitation (48% vs. 24%; p < 0.01), and insufficient insurance coverage (58% vs. 44%; p = 0.04).
Conclusions:
There are notable global disparities in the postoperative care of ARM patients, particularly in BMP protocols and treatment regimens, with LMICs facing severe socioeconomic challenges. This emphasizes the urgent need for targeted strategies and resources to enhance outcomes for ARM patients across different regions.
Level Of Evidence:
Level III.
Related Concept Videos
01:21Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
01:26Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
01:29Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...
01:25Peptic Ulcer Disease V: Surgical Management and Nursing Care
Surgical Interventions for Peptic Ulcer Disease
01:25Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
01:24Ostomy Care
An ostomy is a surgical procedure that creates an artificial opening from the intestines to the outside of the body, allowing for the rerouting of effluent. This opening is known as a stoma. A stoma usually protrudes above the skin surface, appearing pink or red, moist, and round, and it lacks nerve sensations.
There are different types of ostomies, including colostomies, ileostomies, and urostomies: