Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026
Standardized Technique of Aortic Valve Re-implantation for Valve-sparing Aortic Root Replacement
Published on: December 11, 2017
Retrospective Analysis of the Clinical Usefulness of a Strut-Adjusted Volume Implant in a Single Center
Arisa Ata-Shiroshita1, Takashi Kuwayama1,2, Masako Kato3
1Division of Breast Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Objective:
Reports demonstrating the effectiveness and safety of strut-adjusted volume implants (SAVI) in Japan are limited. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the treatment outcomes of SAVI and whole-breast irradiation (WBI) at a single facility.
Materials And Methods:
Data were retrospectively extracted from the medical records of patients treated with SAVI or WBI following partial mastectomy (Bp). Patients undergoing Bp, sentinel lymph node biopsy, and SAVI spacer insertion followed by brachytherapy with the SAVI device were compared to those followed with WBI. Local recurrence was assessed annually by physical examination, bilateral mammography, and breast ultrasonography.
Results:
The SAVI and WBI groups comprised 53 and 113 patients, with a median age of 55 and 52 years, respectively; among them, 47 and 91 patients had a pathological tumor diameter ≤2 cm and six and 22 had a pathological tumor diameter >2 cm, respectively. Recurrence events, acute adverse events, and late adverse events were observed in the SAVI and WBI groups in 1 and 3 (p = 0.726), 24 and 79 (p = 0.01), and 24 and 18 patients (p = 0.00002), respectively, with median observation periods of 60.0 and 47.8 months, respectively. All adverse events were grades 1-2, with dermatitis being the most common in the acute phase. In the late phase, pigmentation was common in both groups.
Conclusion:
The local recurrence rate does not differ between SAVI and WBI within the relatively short-term follow-up period. Longer follow-up is required to confirm our results in the Japanese population.
