Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2025

Bedside Ultrasound for Guiding Fluid Removal in Patients with Pulmonary Edema: The Reverse-FALLS Protocol
Published on: July 28, 2018
Management of Fluid Overload in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis (EASE-TAVR): A Randomized Controlled Trial
Kseniya Halavina1, Matthias Koschutnik1, Carolina Donà1
1Department of Internal Medicine 2, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Background:
Fluid overload (FO) subjects patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) to increased risk for heart failure and death after valve replacement and can be objectively quantified using bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS).
Objectives:
The authors hypothesized that in AS patients with concomitant FO, BIS-guided decongestion could improve prognosis and quality of life following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).
Methods:
This randomized, controlled trial enrolled 232 patients with severe AS scheduled for TAVR. FO was defined using a portable whole-body BIS device according to previously established cutoffs (≥1.0 L and/or ≥7%). Patients with FO (n = 111) were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive BIS-guided decongestion (n = 55) or decongestion by clinical judgment alone (n = 56) following TAVR. Patients without FO (n = 121) served as a control cohort. The primary endpoint was the composite of hospitalization for heart failure and/or all-cause death at 12 months. The secondary endpoint was the change from baseline to 12 months in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire.
Results:
The occurrence of the primary endpoint at 12 months was significantly lower in the BIS-guided vs the non-BIS-guided decongestion group (7/55 [12.7%, all deaths] vs 18/56 [32.1%, 9 hospitalizations for heart failure and 9 deaths]; HR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.15-0.87; absolute risk reduction = -19.4%). Outcomes in the BIS-guided decongestion group were identical to the euvolemic control group (log-rank test, P = 0.7). BIS-guided decongestion was also associated with a higher increase in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score from baseline compared to non-BIS-guided decongestion (P = 0.001).
Conclusions:
In patients with severe AS and concomitant FO, quantitatively guided decongestive treatment and associated intensified management post-TAVR was associated with improved outcomes and quality of life compared to decongestion by clinical judgment alone. (Management of Fluid Overload in Patients Scheduled for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement [EASE-TAVR]; NCT04556123).
More Related Videos
04:48Noninvasive Determination of Vortex Formation Time Using Transesophageal Echocardiography During Cardiac Surgery
Published on: November 28, 2018
08:50Technique and Patient Selection Criteria of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy for Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement
Published on: March 26, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System