Differences in mutations across tumour sizes in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2025

Comparing Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Model Established in Mouse Kidney and on Chicken Chorioallantoic Membrane
Published on: February 8, 2020
Steven M Monda1,2, Benjamin W Carney2, Allison M May3
1Department of Urologic Surgery, UC Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Objective:
To assess the distribution of key mutations across tumour sizes in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), and secondarily to examine the prognostic impact of aggressive mutations in smaller ccRCCs.
Patient And Methods:
The distribution of mutations (VHL, PBRM1, SETD2, BAP1 and CDKN2A loss) across tumour sizes was assessed in 1039 ccRCCs treated with nephrectomy in cohorts obtained from the Tracking Cancer Evolution (TRACERx), The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Cancer Genomics of the Kidney (CAGEKID) projects. Logistic regression was used to model the presence of each mutation against size. In our secondary analysis, we assessed a subset of ccRCCs ≤7 cm for associations of key aggressive mutations (SETD2, BAP1, and CDKN2A loss) with metastasis, invasive disease and overall survival, while controlling for size. A subset of localised tumours ≤7 cm was also used to assess associations with recurrence after nephrectomy.
Results:
On logistic regression, each 1-cm increase in tumour size was associated with aggressive mutations, SETD2, BAP1, and CDKN2A loss, at odds ratios (ORs) of 1.09, 1.10 and 1.19 (P < 0.001), whereas no significant association was observed between tumour size and PBRM1 (OR 1.02; P = 0.23). VHL was mildly negatively associated with a 1-cm increase in size (OR 0.95; P = 0.01). Among tumours ≤7 cm, SETD2 and CDKN2A loss were associated with metastatic disease at ORs of 3.86 and 3.84 (P < 0.05) while controlling for tumour size. CDKN2A loss was associated with worse overall survival, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.19 (P = 0.03). Among localised tumours ≤7 cm, SETD2 was associated with worse recurrence-free survival (HR 2.00; P = 0.03).
Conclusion:
Large and small ccRCCs are genomically different. Aggressive mutations, namely, SETD2, BAP1, and CDKN2A loss, are rarely observed in small ccRCCs and are observed more frequently in larger tumours. However, when present in tumours ≤7 cm, SETD2 mutations and CDKN2A loss were still independently associated with invasive disease, metastasis, worse survival, and recurrence after resection, after controlling for size.
Insights
Clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) shows genomic differences based on tumour size. Aggressive mutations like SETD2, BAP1, and CDKN2A loss are more common in larger ccRCCs but still impact smaller tumours.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genetics
- Genomic Medicine
Background:
- Clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most common kidney cancer subtype.
- Tumour size is a known prognostic factor in ccRCC.
- Understanding the genomic landscape of ccRCC relative to tumour size is crucial for targeted therapies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between tumour size and the distribution of key mutations (VHL, PBRM1, SETD2, BAP1, CDKN2A loss) in ccRCC.
- To evaluate the prognostic significance of aggressive mutations in smaller ccRCCs (≤7 cm).
Main Methods:
- Analysis of mutation data from 1039 ccRCC patients across TRACERx, TCGA, and CAGEKID cohorts.
- Logistic regression modeling to correlate mutation presence with tumour size.
- Survival and metastasis analyses for aggressive mutations in tumours ≤7 cm, controlling for tumour size.
Main Results:
- Tumour size was positively associated with aggressive mutations SETD2, BAP1, and CDKN2A loss (P<0.001).
- VHL showed a mild negative association with size (P=0.01), while PBRM1 showed no significant association.
- In ccRCCs ≤7 cm, SETD2 and CDKN2A loss correlated with metastatic disease (ORs ~3.86, P<0.05) and CDKN2A loss with worse overall survival (HR 2.19, P=0.03).
Conclusions:
- ccRCC exhibits distinct genomic profiles based on tumour size.
- Aggressive mutations are less frequent in small ccRCCs but retain prognostic significance for metastasis, survival, and recurrence.
- These findings highlight the importance of molecular profiling even in smaller ccRCCs.
Related Concept Videos
Cancers Originate from Somatic Mutations in a Single Cell
Adaptive Mechanisms in Cancer Cells
Some of the advantages that cancer cells have on normal cells include - enhanced ability to divide without terminally differentiating, induce new blood vessel formation,...
The Ras Gene
Ras is a...
Tumor Progression
Colon cancer is one of the best-documented examples of tumor progression. Early mutation in the APC gene in colon cells causes a small growth on the colon wall called a polyp. With time, this polyp grows into a benign, pre-cancerous tumor. Further...

