Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

Tumor Treating Field Therapy in Combination with Bevacizumab for the Treatment of Recurrent Glioblastoma
Published on: October 27, 2014
Sacituzumab-govitecan in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: a multicenter effectiveness and safety study
Isabel María Carrión-Madroñal1, Rocío Díaz-Acedo2, Santiago José Lora-Escobar2
1Servicio de Farmacia, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Seville, 41009, SPAIN.
Abstract:
Aim: Sacituzumab-govitecan (Sgov) is a new antibody-drug conjugate recently approved for metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC), so there are still few data published in the real-world setting.Materials & methods: This study was to analyze the effectiveness and safety of Sgov in mTNBC of patients from the three main hospitals of a city and to compare with the pivotal ASCENT-trial. A total of 46 patients were included, all women diagnosed with mTNBC, with a median age of 52 years and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1 71.8% of patients.Results: Sgov effectiveness data seem to be slightly inferior than expected. Furthermore, it is observed that patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group of two or higher benefit significantly less from treatment with the drug. Safety profile of Sgov is acceptable.
Insights
Sacituzumab-govitecan (Sgov) shows acceptable safety in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) real-world data. However, effectiveness may be lower than expected, especially for patients with poorer performance status.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Sacituzumab-govitecan (Sgov) is an antibody-drug conjugate approved for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC).
- Limited real-world data exists for Sgov in mTNBC patients.
- The pivotal ASCENT trial provides a benchmark for Sgov efficacy and safety.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the real-world effectiveness and safety of Sgov in mTNBC patients.
- To compare Sgov outcomes in a real-world setting with the ASCENT trial results.
- To identify patient subgroups that may benefit less from Sgov treatment.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 46 mTNBC patients treated with Sgov across three major hospitals.
- Data collection included patient demographics, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, and treatment outcomes.
- Comparison of real-world data with findings from the ASCENT trial.
Main Results:
- Real-world effectiveness of Sgov appeared slightly lower than anticipated from clinical trials.
- Patients with an ECOG performance status of two or higher demonstrated significantly reduced benefit from Sgov.
- The safety profile of Sgov was deemed acceptable in this patient cohort.
Conclusions:
- Sgov demonstrates an acceptable safety profile in real-world mTNBC treatment.
- Real-world effectiveness may not fully align with pivotal trial data, particularly for patients with compromised performance status.
- Further investigation into patient selection and treatment optimization for Sgov in mTNBC is warranted.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Treatment Resistant Cancers

