Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2025

Clinical Protocol of Producing Adipose Tissue-Derived Stromal Vascular Fraction for Potential Cartilage Regeneration
Published on: September 29, 2018
Factors Associated With Improvement Following In-office Steroid Injections for Vocal Fold Scar.
Naomi Tesema1, Taylor G Lackey1, Mackenzie O'Connor1
1NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, U.S.A.
In-office vocal fold steroid injections (VFSI) offer modest voice improvement for vocal fold scar patients, with about half showing videostroboscopy benefits. Early vocal injury presentation may predict better outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Otolaryngology
- Speech-Language Pathology
- Vocal Health
Background:
- Vocal fold scar can significantly impair voice quality and function.
- In-office vocal fold steroid injections (VFSI) are an emerging treatment option.
- Evaluating clinical outcomes and novel acoustic measures is crucial for understanding VFSI efficacy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the clinical outcomes of in-office vocal fold steroid injections (VFSI) in patients with vocal fold scar.
- To investigate the impact of VFSI on voice quality using the Voice Handicap Index (VHI-10) and acoustic parameters like cepstral peak prominence (CPP) and fundamental frequency coefficient of variation (F0CoV).
- To explore the relationship between patient characteristics and treatment success.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 22 patients with vocal fold scar receiving in-office VFSI between 2013 and 2024.
- Comparison of pre- and post-injection VHI-10 scores, stroboscopic vibratory parameters (mucosal wave, amplitude), and acoustic measures (CPP, F0CoV).
- Statistical analysis using Wilcoxon signed-rank and McNemar's tests to determine significance.
Main Results:
- A median decrease of 4 points in VHI-10 was observed post-injection (p=0.02).
- 45% of patients showed improvement in mucosal wave and/or amplitude; earlier vocal injury presentation correlated with improved left vocal fold vibratory parameters (p=0.03).
- No significant changes were found in CPP or F0CoV; no baseline characteristics predicted vibratory improvement.
Conclusions:
- In-office VFSI provides modest voice use improvement for vocal fold scar patients, potentially less impactful than previously assumed.
- Videostroboscopic improvement is observed in approximately half of the patients.
- Recency of vocal injury is a potential predictor of success, aiding in patient counseling regarding VFSI benefits.
More Related Videos
05:50Subcutaneous Neurotrophin 4 Infusion Using Osmotic Pumps or Direct Muscular Injection Enhances Aging Rat Laryngeal Muscles
Published on: June 13, 2017
06:36Nerve Stimulator-guided Injection of Autologous Stem Cells Near the Equine Left Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve
Published on: September 26, 2018