Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2025

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
Availability of Evidence for Predictive Machine Learning Algorithms in Primary Care: A Systematic Review
Margot M Rakers1,2, Marieke M van Buchem3, Sergej Kucenko4
1Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, ZA Leiden, the Netherlands.
This study found that evidence for predictive machine learning (ML) algorithms in primary care is often lacking, especially regarding quality criteria. Adopting guidelines like the Dutch AIPA can improve transparency and trust for wider implementation.
Area of Science:
- Health Informatics
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Primary Care Research
Background:
- Primary healthcare faces challenges from aging populations and staff shortages.
- Predictive machine learning (ML) offers potential solutions but faces concerns regarding transparency and reporting of validation and implementation effectiveness.
- There is a need to systematically assess the evidence base for ML algorithms in primary care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically identify predictive ML algorithms used in primary care.
- To evaluate the public availability of evidence across the AI life cycle for these algorithms.
- To assess adherence to reporting guidelines for predictive ML algorithms in primary care.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, etc.) from January 2000 to July 2023.
- Searches included peer-reviewed literature and registration databases for FDA- and CE-marked predictive ML algorithms.
- Evidence availability was assessed against the Dutch AI predictive algorithm (AIPA) guideline requirements across all AI life cycle phases.
Main Results:
- 43 predictive ML algorithms were identified; 25 were commercially available (FDA/CE-marked).
- Most algorithms focused on cardiovascular diseases and diabetes, with 81% published in the last 5 years.
- Evidence availability was lowest for algorithm preparation (19%) and impact assessment (30%), with peer-reviewed literature showing higher availability (45%) than regulatory databases (29%).
Conclusions:
- There is a critical need to enhance the availability of evidence concerning the quality criteria of predictive ML algorithms in primary care.
- Implementing the Dutch AIPA guideline can promote transparent and standardized reporting.
- Improved reporting can foster end-user trust and facilitate the large-scale adoption of these technologies.
More Related Videos
04:09Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: October 10, 2018
12:18A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
Published on: January 11, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Current Trends in Nursing II
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Preventive Healthcare Services
Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters...
Methods of Documentation VII: EMR