Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2025

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents
Published on: August 2, 2018
Central and peripheral physiological responses to decision making in hoarding disorder
Hannah C Levy1, Adam J Naples2, Sarah Collett1
1Anxiety Disorders Center, Institute of Living, 200 Retreat Avenue, Hartford, CT 06106, USA.
Insights
Neurobiological models of hoarding disorder (HD) were not supported by this study. Error-related negativity (ERN) and psychophysiological responses did not differ between individuals with HD and control groups during simulated discarding tasks.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Psychiatry
- Cognitive Psychology
Background:
- Hoarding disorder (HD) involves persistent difficulty discarding possessions, leading to clutter.
- A biphasic neurobiological model proposes blunted resting/neutral state nervous system activity and exaggerated discarding-related activity in HD.
- This study investigated neural and psychophysiological correlates of decision-making in HD.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare error-related negativity (ERN) and psychophysiological responses during neutral and discarding decisions in individuals with HD, anxiety disorder controls, and healthy controls.
- To examine resting-state alpha asymmetry between HD and control groups.
- To test the predictions of the biphasic neurobiological model of HD.
Main Methods:
- Compared ERN and psychophysiological measures (skin conductance, heart rate variability, end-tidal CO2) during Go/No Go tasks.
- Tasks involved neutral shape selection and simulated discarding of newspaper images.
- Resting-state alpha asymmetry was measured.
- Participants included 26 individuals with HD, 37 with anxiety disorders, and 28 healthy controls.
Main Results:
- All participants exhibited increased frontal negativity upon error commission.
- No significant group differences were found in ERN or psychophysiological measures.
- Resting-state alpha asymmetry did not differ between the hoarding disorder and control groups.
Conclusions:
- The findings do not support the proposed biphasic neurobiological model regarding ERN and psychophysiological differences in simulated discarding tasks.
- Null results may stem from methodological limitations of using Go/No Go tasks for discarding simulations.
- Further research with ecologically valid discarding tasks is needed to validate or refute the model.
Abstract:
Individuals with hoarding disorder (HD) have difficulty parting with personal possessions, which leads to the accumulation of excessive clutter. According to a proposed biphasic neurobiological model, HD is characterized by blunted central and peripheral nervous system activity at rest and during neutral (non-discarding) decisions, and exaggerated activity during decision-making about discarding personal possessions. Here, we compared the error-related negativity (ERN) and psychophysiological responses (skin conductance, heart rate and heart rate variability, and end tidal CO2) during neutral and discarding-related decisions in 26 individuals with HD, 37 control participants with anxiety disorders, and 28 healthy control participants without psychiatric diagnoses. We also compared alpha asymmetry between the HD and control groups during a baseline resting phase. Participants completed a series of Go/No Go decision-making tasks, one involving choosing certain shapes (neutral task) and the other involving choosing images of newspapers to imaginally "discard" (discarding task). While all participants showed expected increased frontal negativity to commission of an error, contrary to hypotheses, there were no group differences in the ERN or any psychophysiological measures. Alpha asymmetry at rest also did not differ between groups. The findings suggest that the ERN and psychophysiological responses may not differ in individuals with HD during simulated discarding decisions relative to control participants, although the null results may be explained by methodological challenges in using Go/No Go tasks as discarding tasks. Future replication and extension of these results will be needed using ecologically valid discarding tasks.
Related Concept Videos
Reason and Intuition
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Hypothalamic-Pituitary Axis
Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
Psychological Responses to Stress

