Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

High-throughput Detection Method for Influenza Virus
Published on: February 4, 2012
The demonstration of the influenza virus by the method of the immune electron microscopy
Abstract:
The direct and indirect method of the Immune electron microscopy (IEM) was used for the identification of two influenza viruses of the type A--[strain A/Chabarovsk/77 (H1N1) and A/Texas/77 (H3N2)]--by means of reference specific rat- and human- convalescent sera. In the cross-testing different dilutions of the virus in the allantoic fluid and of the sera were examined for the determination of the appropriate rates for the formation of the immunocomplexes. In the demonstration of the immunocomplexes the higher sensitivity of the indirect method was proved, by using the pig-anti-human-IgG serum,--in comparing with the direct method.
Insights
Immune electron microscopy identified two influenza A virus strains using specific antisera. The indirect method demonstrated higher sensitivity for detecting immunocomplexes compared to the direct method.
Area of Science:
- Virology
- Immunology
- Microscopy
Background:
- Influenza A virus identification is crucial for public health.
- Immune electron microscopy (IEM) is a valuable diagnostic tool.
- Comparing direct and indirect IEM methods can optimize viral detection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify influenza A virus strains using IEM.
- To compare the sensitivity of direct and indirect IEM methods.
Main Methods:
- Immune electron microscopy (IEM), both direct and indirect, was employed.
- Specific rat and human convalescent antisera were used for identification.
- Cross-testing involved various dilutions of virus and antisera to assess immunocomplex formation.
Main Results:
- Two influenza A virus strains, A/Chabarovsk/77 (H1N1) and A/Texas/77 (H3N2), were successfully identified.
- The indirect IEM method exhibited higher sensitivity in demonstrating immunocomplexes.
- This enhanced sensitivity was observed when using pig-anti-human-IgG serum compared to the direct method.
Conclusions:
- Indirect IEM is a more sensitive method for influenza virus identification.
- The findings support the use of indirect IEM for improved viral detection and characterization.
More Related Videos
08:01Imaging Cell Interaction in Tracheal Mucosa During Influenza Virus Infection Using Two-photon Intravital Microscopy
Published on: August 17, 2018
08:19Subnanometer-Resolution Structural Determination of Hemagglutinin from Cryo-Electron Tomography of Influenza Viruses
Published on: November 7, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Immunofluorescence Microscopy
The...
Immunogold Electron Microscopy