The demonstration of the influenza virus by the method of the immune electron microscopy

Journal of Hygiene, Epidemiology, Microbiology, and Immunology
|January 1, 1985
PubMed

Insights

Immune electron microscopy identified two influenza A virus strains using specific antisera. The indirect method demonstrated higher sensitivity for detecting immunocomplexes compared to the direct method.

Area of Science:

  • Virology
  • Immunology
  • Microscopy

Background:

  • Influenza A virus identification is crucial for public health.
  • Immune electron microscopy (IEM) is a valuable diagnostic tool.
  • Comparing direct and indirect IEM methods can optimize viral detection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify influenza A virus strains using IEM.
  • To compare the sensitivity of direct and indirect IEM methods.

Main Methods:

  • Immune electron microscopy (IEM), both direct and indirect, was employed.
  • Specific rat and human convalescent antisera were used for identification.
  • Cross-testing involved various dilutions of virus and antisera to assess immunocomplex formation.

Main Results:

  • Two influenza A virus strains, A/Chabarovsk/77 (H1N1) and A/Texas/77 (H3N2), were successfully identified.
  • The indirect IEM method exhibited higher sensitivity in demonstrating immunocomplexes.
  • This enhanced sensitivity was observed when using pig-anti-human-IgG serum compared to the direct method.

Conclusions:

  • Indirect IEM is a more sensitive method for influenza virus identification.
  • The findings support the use of indirect IEM for improved viral detection and characterization.