Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2025
Quantitative Visualization and Detection of Skin Cancer Using Dynamic Thermal Imaging
Published on: May 5, 2011
Using AI to Differentiate Mpox From Common Skin Lesions in a Sexual Health Clinic: Algorithm Development and
Nyi Nyi Soe1,2, Zhen Yu1,3, Phyu Mon Latt1,2
1Artificial Intelligence and Modelling in Epidemiology Program, Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Background:
The 2022 global outbreak of mpox has significantly impacted health facilities, and necessitated additional infection prevention and control measures and alterations to clinic processes. Early identification of suspected mpox cases will assist in mitigating these impacts.
Objective:
We aimed to develop and evaluate an artificial intelligence (AI)-based tool to differentiate mpox lesion images from other skin lesions seen in a sexual health clinic.
Methods:
We used a data set with 2200 images, that included mpox and non-mpox lesions images, collected from Melbourne Sexual Health Centre and web resources. We adopted deep learning approaches which involved 6 different deep learning architectures to train our AI models. We subsequently evaluated the performance of each model using a hold-out data set and an external validation data set to determine the optimal model for differentiating between mpox and non-mpox lesions.
Results:
The DenseNet-121 model outperformed other models with an overall area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.928, an accuracy of 0.848, a precision of 0.942, a recall of 0.742, and an F1-score of 0.834. Implementation of a region of interest approach significantly improved the performance of all models, with the AUC for the DenseNet-121 model increasing to 0.982. This approach resulted in an increase in the correct classification of mpox images from 79% (55/70) to 94% (66/70). The effectiveness of this approach was further validated by a visual analysis with gradient-weighted class activation mapping, demonstrating a reduction in false detection within the background of lesion images. On the external validation data set, ResNet-18 and DenseNet-121 achieved the highest performance. ResNet-18 achieved an AUC of 0.990 and an accuracy of 0.947, and DenseNet-121 achieved an AUC of 0.982 and an accuracy of 0.926.
Conclusions:
Our study demonstrated it was possible to use an AI-based image recognition algorithm to accurately differentiate between mpox and common skin lesions. Our findings provide a foundation for future investigations aimed at refining the algorithm and establishing the place of such technology in a sexual health clinic.
