Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2025

An Improved Method for Collection of Cerebrospinal Fluid from Anesthetized Mice
Published on: March 19, 2018
Core CSF Biomarker Profile in Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy: Updated Meta-Analysis
Andreas Charidimou1, Gregoire Boulouis1
1From the Department of Neurology (A.C.), Boston University Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, MA; and Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (G.B.), University Hospital, Tours, France.
Background And Objectives:
There is a clear need to characterize and validate molecular biomarkers of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), in an effort to improve diagnostics, especially in the context of patients with Alzheimer disease (AD) receiving immunotherapies (for whom underlying CAA is the driver of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities). We performed an updated meta-analysis of 5 core CSF biomarkers (Aβ42, Aβ40, Aβ438, total tau [T-tau], and phosphorylated tau [P-tau]) to assess which of these are most altered in sporadic CAA.
Methods:
We systematically searched PubMed for eligible studies reporting data on CSF biomarkers reflecting APP metabolism (Aβ42, Aβ40, Aβ38), neurodegeneration (T-tau), and tangle pathology (P-tau), in symptomatic sporadic CAA cohorts (based on the Boston criteria) vs control groups and/or vs patients with AD. Biomarker performance was assessed in random-effects meta-analysis based on ratio of mean (RoM) biomarker concentrations in (1) patients with CAA to controls and (2) CAA to patients with AD. RoM >1 indicates higher biomarker concentration in CAA vs comparison population, and RoM <1 indicates higher concentration in comparison groups.
Results:
8 studies met inclusion criteria: a total of 11 CAA cohorts (n = 289), 9 control cohorts (n = 310), and 8 AD cohorts (n = 339). Overall included studies were of medium quality based on our assessment tools. CAA to controls had lower mean level of all amyloid markers with CSF Aβ42, Aβ40, and Aβ38 RoMs of 0.46 (95% CI 0.38-0.55, p < 0.0001), 0.70 (95% CI 0.63-0.78, p < 0.0001), and 0.71 (95% CI 0.56-0.89, p = 0.003), respectively. CSF T-tau and P-tau RoMs of patients with CAA to controls were both greater than 1: 1.56 (95% CI 1.32-1.84, p < 0.0001) and 1.31 (95% CI 1.13-1.51, p < 0.0001), respectively. Differentiation between CAA and AD was strong for CSF Aβ40 (RoM 0.76, 95% CI 0.69-0.83, p < 0.0001) and Aβ38 (RoM 0.55, 95% CI 0.38-0.81, p < 0.0001), but not Aβ42 (RoM 1.00; 95% CI 0.81-1.23, p = 0.970). For T-tau and P-tau, average CSF ratios in patients with CAA vs AD were 0.64 (95% CI 0.58-0.71, p < 0.0001) and 0.64 (95% CI 0.58-0.71, p < 0.0001), respectively.
Discussion:
Specific CSF patterns of Aβ42, Aβ40, Aβ38, T-tau, and P-tau might serve as molecular biomarkers of CAA, in research and clinical settings, offering the potential to improve the clinical diagnostic approach pathway in specific scenarios.
More Related Videos
07:08A High Throughput, Multiplexed and Targeted Proteomic CSF Assay to Quantify Neurodegenerative Biomarkers and Apolipoprotein E Isoforms Status
Published on: October 20, 2016
08:08A Technique for Serial Collection of Cerebrospinal Fluid from the Cisterna Magna in Mouse
Published on: November 10, 2008