Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2025

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Dual-chamber vs. single-chamber pacemaker in patients in sinus rhythm with an atrioventricular block: a nationwide
Alexandre Bodin1, Ivann Texier1, Arnaud Bisson1
1Service de Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Trousseau, Faculté de Médecine, Université François Rabelais, 37000 Tours, France.
Insights
Dual-chamber pacemakers significantly reduce mortality and adverse events in patients with complete atrioventricular block and sinus rhythm compared to single-chamber devices. This study supports current guidelines favoring dual-chamber pacemaker implantation for improved patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Clinical Research
Background:
- Complete atrioventricular block (AVB) with sinus rhythm often necessitates pacemaker implantation.
- Current guidelines recommend dual-chamber pacemakers over single-chamber ones, but robust evidence on hard clinical outcomes is limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the long-term clinical effectiveness and safety of dual-chamber versus single-chamber pacemakers in patients with complete AVB and underlying sinus rhythm.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective observational study using a French national administrative database (2013-2022).
- Inclusion of patients with primary pacemaker implantation for complete AVB and sinus rhythm.
- Propensity score matching to create comparable groups of dual-chamber and single-chamber pacemaker recipients (19,219 patients each).
Main Results:
- Dual-chamber pacemakers were associated with significantly lower all-cause mortality (9.22%/year vs 11.48%/year; HR 0.807) and cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.766).
- Reduced incidence of heart failure (HR 0.908), atrial fibrillation (HR 0.778), and ischemic stroke (HR 0.873) observed in the dual-chamber group.
- Fewer re-interventions (upgrades) but more hematomas and lead repositioning noted with dual-chamber devices.
Conclusions:
- Findings support current recommendations for dual-chamber pacemaker preference in complete AVB with sinus rhythm.
- Dual-chamber pacemaker implantation is linked to reduced risks of mortality, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and stroke.
- The benefits of dual-chamber pacing outweigh potential complications in this patient population.
Aims:
In complete atrioventricular block (AVB) with underlying sinus rhythm, it is recommended to implant a dual-chamber pacemaker rather than a single-chamber pacemaker. However, no large-scale study has been able to demonstrate the superiority of this choice on hard clinical criteria such as morbimortality.
Methods And Results:
This retrospective observational study included all patients who received a primary pacemaker implantation in the indication of complete AVB with underlying sinus rhythm in France, based on the national administrative database between January 2013 and December 2022. After propensity score matching, we obtained two groups containing 19 219 patients each. The incidence of all-cause mortality was 9.22%/year for the dual-chamber pacemaker group, compared with 11.48%/year for the single-chamber pacemaker group (hazard ratio (HR) 0.807, P < 0.0001]. Similarly, there was a lower incidence of cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.766, P < 0.0001), heart failure (HR 0.908, P < 0.0001), atrial fibrillation (HR 0.778, P < 0.0001), and ischaemic stroke (HR 0.873, P = 0.008) in the dual-chamber pacemaker group than in the single-chamber pacemaker group. Regarding re-interventions and complications, there were fewer upgrades (addition of atrial lead or left ventricular lead) in the dual-chamber group (HR 0.210, P < 0.0001), but more haematomas (HR 1.179, P = 0.006) and lead repositioning (HR 1.123, P = 0.04).
Conclusion:
In the indication of complete AVB with underlying sinus rhythm, our results are consistent with current recommendations to prefer implantation of a dual-chamber pacemaker rather than a single-chamber pacemaker for these patients. Implantation of a dual-chamber pacemaker is associated with a lower risk of mortality, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and stroke during follow-up.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class I Agents as Sodium Channel Blockers
Class 1A Antiarrhythmic Drugs: These drugs work by moderately blocking sodium channels,...
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class II Agents as β-Adrenergic Blockers
Electrophysiology of Normal Cardiac Rhythm

