Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Molecular Biomarker Testing for Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Published on: September 8, 2023
Latest Developments in "Adaptive Enrichment" Clinical Trial Designs in Oncology
1Division of Biostatistics, Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Abstract:
As cancer has become better understood on the molecular level with the evolution of gene sequencing techniques, considerations for individualized therapy using predictive biomarkers (those associated with a treatment's effect) have shifted to a new level. In the last decade or so, randomized "adaptive enrichment" clinical trials have become increasingly utilized to strike a balance between enrolling all patients with a given tumor type, versus enrolling only a subpopulation whose tumors are defined by a potential predictive biomarker related to the mechanism of action of the experimental therapy. In this review article, we review recent innovative design extensions and adaptations to adaptive enrichment designs proposed during the last few years in the clinical trial methodology literature, both from Bayesian and frequentist perspectives.
Insights
Individualized cancer therapy is advancing with molecular understanding and predictive biomarkers. Adaptive enrichment clinical trials balance broad enrollment with targeted patient selection for experimental treatments.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Clinical Trial Methodology
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Molecular cancer understanding has advanced significantly due to gene sequencing.
- Predictive biomarkers are crucial for developing individualized cancer therapies.
- Adaptive enrichment designs balance broad patient enrollment with biomarker-defined subpopulations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review recent innovative design extensions and adaptations to adaptive enrichment clinical trials.
- To cover both Bayesian and frequentist perspectives in clinical trial methodology.
- To highlight advancements in balancing patient enrollment strategies.
Main Methods:
- Review of recent literature on adaptive enrichment clinical trial designs.
- Analysis of innovative extensions and adaptations from Bayesian and frequentist viewpoints.
- Synthesis of methodologies for optimizing clinical trial enrollment.
Main Results:
- Identification of novel adaptive enrichment design variations.
- Discussion of the application of Bayesian and frequentist approaches to these designs.
- Highlighting of strategies to balance patient selection in clinical trials.
Conclusions:
- Adaptive enrichment designs are evolving with innovative extensions.
- Both Bayesian and frequentist methods offer valuable approaches to adaptive enrichment.
- These advancements are critical for efficient and effective individualized cancer therapy development.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Cancer Survival Analysis
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Tumor Immunotherapy
Cancer Vaccines
Cancer vaccines come in two categories: preventive (prophylactic) and treatment (active). Preventive vaccines, such as the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, protect against viruses that cause certain...

