Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2025

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat
Published on: September 12, 2014
Surprising sounds influence risky decision making
Gloria W Feng1, Robb B Rutledge2,3,4,5
1Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA. gloria.feng@yale.edu.
Unexpected sounds can increase risk-taking and reduce decision-making errors in humans. These auditory prediction errors influence choices, impacting adaptive behavior and daily decision-making processes.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Decision Science
- Auditory Perception
Background:
- Adaptive behavior relies on navigating environmental uncertainty.
- Incidental sensory events can either distract or lead to rigid responses.
- The impact of task-irrelevant sensory prediction errors on decision-making is not fully understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how task-irrelevant sensory prediction errors influence risky decision-making in humans.
- To determine if auditory prediction errors increase risk-taking or choice perseveration.
Main Methods:
- Seven experiments with 1600 human participants were conducted.
- Rare auditory sequences were presented before option presentation.
- Computational modeling and control experiments were used to analyze effects.
Main Results:
- Rare auditory sequences significantly increased risk-taking and decreased choice perseveration.
- Risk-taking and perseveration effects were dissociable based on auditory statistics.
- Effects were explained by value-independent risky bias and perseveration parameters, linked to dopamine.
Conclusions:
- Incidental auditory prediction errors can systematically bias human decision-making towards risk-taking and reduced perseveration.
- These findings suggest that even irrelevant sounds can influence everyday choices.
- The observed effects are not due to increased decision noise or erroneous beliefs.
More Related Videos
13:04Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
07:05Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
Published on: September 10, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Reason and Intuition
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Factors Affecting Perception
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
Subliminal Perception