Related Experiment Videos
Use of modified radioallergosorbent testing in determining initial immunotherapy doses
Summary
The modified radioallergosorbent test (RAST) for allergy diagnosis does not offer advantages over skin testing. Allergy immunotherapy schedules showed no significant differences in initial concentrations or injection numbers.
Area of Science:
- Allergy and Immunology
- Diagnostic Testing
Background:
- The modified radioallergosorbent test (RAST) is proposed as an alternative to skin testing for allergy diagnosis.
- Proponents suggest modified RAST allows for safer initiation of immunotherapy at higher concentrations and fewer injections.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the claimed advantages of modified RAST over skin testing in allergy diagnosis and immunotherapy.
- To compare immunotherapy dosing and injection schedules based on modified RAST results versus conventional methods.
Main Methods:
- Determined the most important allergen for 58 patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis via history, skin testing, and aeroallergen surveys.
- Performed modified RAST for identified allergens.
- Compared projected immunotherapy schedules (initial concentration, total injections) based on modified RAST classes (3, 4, 5) with conventional schedules.
Main Results:
- 67% of patients were modified RAST class 5, 31% were class 4, and 1% were class 3.
- Projected immunotherapy schedules for modified RAST class 5 (1:62,500 w/v, 27 injections) and class 4 (1:12,500 w/v, 21 injections) showed minimal differences compared to the conventional schedule (1:100,000 w/v, 23 injections).
Conclusions:
- The modified RAST does not provide a significant advantage over skin testing for determining allergy immunotherapy protocols in this patient population.
- Conventional immunotherapy dosing and schedules appear comparable to those derived from modified RAST results.