Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Aspects Concerning Parallel Robots Used in Rehabilitation.

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)·2025

Same author

Estimation of the Kinematics and Workspace of a Robot Using Artificial Neural Networks.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2022

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 13, 2025

Author Spotlight: Assessing Brain Activity in Robotic-Assisted Lower Limb Rehabilitation Using fNIRS

Author Spotlight: Assessing Brain Activity in Robotic-Assisted Lower Limb Rehabilitation Using fNIRS

Published on: June 7, 2024

Robotics in Physical Rehabilitation: Systematic Review.

Adriana Daniela Banyai¹, Cornel Brișan¹

¹Department of Mechatronics and Machine Dynamics, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)

|September 14, 2024

Summary

Robotic technologies significantly enhance motor rehabilitation for physical disabilities by improving function and enabling skill relearning. Challenges like cost and accessibility must be addressed for wider adoption.

Keywords:

motor rehabilitation robot-assisted therapy robotic care

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Post-Stroke Upper Limb Rehabilitation with Robotic Technologies for Improved Motor Recovery and Functional Outcomes

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Post-Stroke Upper Limb Rehabilitation with Robotic Technologies for Improved Motor Recovery and Functional Outcomes

Published on: September 6, 2024

The Combined Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Robotic Therapy for the Upper Limb

The Combined Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Robotic Therapy for the Upper Limb

Published on: September 23, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 13, 2025

Author Spotlight: Assessing Brain Activity in Robotic-Assisted Lower Limb Rehabilitation Using fNIRS

Author Spotlight: Assessing Brain Activity in Robotic-Assisted Lower Limb Rehabilitation Using fNIRS

Published on: June 7, 2024

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Post-Stroke Upper Limb Rehabilitation with Robotic Technologies for Improved Motor Recovery and Functional Outcomes

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Post-Stroke Upper Limb Rehabilitation with Robotic Technologies for Improved Motor Recovery and Functional Outcomes

Published on: September 6, 2024

The Combined Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Robotic Therapy for the Upper Limb

The Combined Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Robotic Therapy for the Upper Limb

Published on: September 23, 2018

Area of Science:

Rehabilitation Medicine
Robotics
Neuroscience

Background:

Rising global prevalence of motor disabilities necessitates advanced rehabilitation solutions.
Robotic technologies offer promising avenues for improving functional recovery and patient autonomy.

Purpose of the Study:

To systematically review the progress and challenges of implementing robotic technologies in motor rehabilitation.
To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of robotic interventions compared to traditional methods.

Main Methods:

Systematic review of key studies on robotic rehabilitation.
Analysis of clinical effectiveness, focusing on motor function, strength, coordination, and dexterity.
Examination of factors supporting neuroplasticity and motor skill relearning.

Main Results:

Robotic therapies demonstrate significant improvements in motor function, strength, coordination, and dexterity.
Robotic systems facilitate neuroplasticity through precise, controlled, and repetitive exercises.
High costs, need for specialized training, and limited accessibility hinder technology adoption.

Conclusions:

Personalized robotic therapies are crucial, addressing technical, economic, social, and cultural barriers.
Continued research is vital to optimize robotic technologies and implementation strategies.
Overcoming challenges can revolutionize motor rehabilitation, enhancing quality of life and social integration.