Comparative Prognostic Value of Coronary Calcium Score and Perivascular Fat Attenuation Index in Coronary Artery

Maria Teresa Savo1, Morena De Amicis2, Dan Alexandru Cozac3

  • 1Cardiology Unit, Cardio-thoraco-vascular and Public Health Department, Padova University Hospital, 35121 Padova, Italy.

Journal of Clinical Medicine
|September 14, 2024
PubMed

Insights

Coronary artery disease (CAD) risk can be better assessed by combining coronary artery calcium scoring (CACs) with the perivascular fat attenuation index (pFAI). This integrated approach enhances cardiovascular risk stratification beyond traditional methods for improved CAD prevention.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Radiology
  • Preventive Cardiology

Background:

  • Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a leading cause of death globally, characterized by atherosclerotic plaque buildup.
  • Non-obstructive CAD contributes to myocardial infarctions, highlighting the need for comprehensive plaque assessment.
  • Cardiac Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) is effective for excluding obstructive CAD and characterizing plaques.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the roles of coronary artery calcium score (CACs) and perivascular fat attenuation index (pFAI) in CAD risk stratification.
  • To explore the integration of CACs and pFAI for enhanced cardiovascular risk assessment.
  • To emphasize the importance of assessing both calcified and non-calcified plaques, along with vascular inflammation.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current literature on CCTA, CACs, and pFAI in CAD assessment.
  • Discussion of CACs derived from non-contrast CT for quantifying calcified plaque burden.
  • Explanation of pFAI derived from CCTA as a marker of coronary inflammation.

Main Results:

  • CACs quantifies calcified plaque burden and stratifies cardiovascular risk, particularly in asymptomatic individuals.
  • pFAI, an emerging marker from CCTA, indicates vascular inflammation and predicts adverse cardiac events.
  • Current methods like CACs do not fully capture non-calcified plaque or inflammatory status.

Conclusions:

  • Combining CACs and pFAI offers a comprehensive approach to cardiovascular risk stratification.
  • Integrating calcification burden (CACs) with inflammatory markers (pFAI) can improve CAD prevention and management.
  • Advanced CCTA techniques enable precise plaque quantification and characterization for better patient outcomes.