Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2025

08:28
Development of an In Vitro Ocular Platform to Test Contact Lenses
Published on: April 6, 2016
10.6K
Experimental Study on Ocular Surface Protection by Soft Contact Lenses Due to Volcanic Ash Exposure
Hiroshi Toshida1,2, Yusuke Matsuzaki1, Masahiro Miyazaki2
1Department of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Shizuoka Hospital, 1129 Nagaoka, Izunokuni 410-2295, Japan.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
|September 14, 2024
Summary
Volcanic ash exposure caused less corneal and conjunctival erosion in soft contact lens (SCL) wearers than in bare eyes. Findings suggest SCL wearers should prioritize evacuation over lens removal during ashfall events.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Environmental Health
- Disaster Medicine
Background:
- Sudden volcanic eruptions can cause eye exposure to ash, leading to discomfort and complicating evacuations.
- The impact of volcanic ash on ocular tissues, particularly with soft contact lens (SCL) wear, is not well-documented.
- This study experimentally investigates the effects of volcanic ash on the eyes of SCL wearers versus bare eyes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the ocular tissue damage caused by volcanic ash exposure in rabbits wearing SCLs versus those with bare eyes.
- To evaluate the protective effect, if any, of SCLs against volcanic ash-induced ocular injury.
- To inform public health guidelines regarding SCL wear during volcanic ashfall events.
Main Methods:
- White rabbits were divided into three groups: bare eye exposure, SCL-wearing eye exposure, and a control (eye washing only).
- Volcanic ash was applied to the eyes of the experimental groups under topical anesthesia, followed by immediate saline rinsing.
- Ocular examinations included slit-lamp microscopy and histopathological analysis post-euthanasia.
Main Results:
- The bare eye group exhibited significantly more severe corneal and conjunctival erosion compared to the SCL group.
- Eyes wearing SCLs showed limited ocular damage from volcanic ash exposure.
- The control group, receiving only eye washing, demonstrated no ocular damage.
Conclusions:
- Current guidelines recommend SCL removal during ashfall, but findings suggest SCLs may offer some protection against ash-related corneal and conjunctival damage.
- Ocular tissue damage was less severe in SCL-wearing eyes than in bare eyes following volcanic ash exposure.
- In sudden ashfall events, prioritizing evacuation over immediate SCL removal may be advisable for affected individuals.

