Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2025

07:07
Biomechanical Characterization of Human Soft Tissues Using Indentation and Tensile Testing
Published on: December 13, 2016
31.7K
Deep Indentation Tests of Soft Materials Using Mobile and Stationary Devices
Joanna Nowak1, Mariusz K Kaczmarek1
1Faculty of Mechatronics, Kazimierz Wielki University, 85-074 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
|September 14, 2024
Summary
Comparing mobile and stationary indentation handles, this study found comparable test repeatability for soft materials. Key force descriptors effectively characterize foam and silicone layer properties, distinguishing deep from shallow indentation methods.
Area of Science:
- Materials Science
- Biomedical Engineering
- Food Science
Background:
- Soft material property measurement is crucial for medical diagnostics, food quality, and technical applications.
- Non-invasive indentation testing is valuable but challenged by material positioning stability.
- Operator-held devices exacerbate positioning issues in indentation tests.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare indentation test results using mobile versus stationary handles for soft materials.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of different handle types in characterizing material properties.
- To identify key descriptors for assessing foam and silicone layer characteristics via deep indentation.
Main Methods:
- Indentation tests were performed on polyurethane foams with varying stiffness and silicone layers (0.5-1 mm).
- A flat cylindrical indenter (1 cm² surface area) was used for deep indentation tests (10 mm depth).
- Force changes over time were recorded to determine five indentation test descriptors.
Main Results:
- Maximum forces during recessing/retraction and curve slopes effectively characterized elastic properties of foams and layered materials.
- These descriptors captured characteristics of both foam and silicone layers in two-layer materials.
- Deep indentation method's descriptors distinguished it from shallow indentation techniques.
Conclusions:
- Mobile and stationary indentation handles demonstrate comparable test repeatability for soft materials.
- Deep indentation descriptors reliably characterize soft materials, including layered structures.
- The findings support the use of indentation for objective soft material assessment regardless of handle type.

