Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2025

Data Acquisition Protocol for Determining Embedded Sensitivity Functions
Published on: April 20, 2016
Static analysis-based rapid fire-following earthquake risk assessment method using simple building and GIS
Jaedo Kang1, Taewook Kang2, Kihak Lee3
1Division of Safety and Infrastructure Research, The Seoul Institute, Seoul, 03909, South Korea.
Abstract:
After the occurrences of large-scale earthquakes, secondary damage (e.g., fire following earthquake) can result in tremendous losses of life, properties, and buildings. To reduce these disaster risks, fire following earthquake assessment methods composed of ignition and fire-burned rate estimation models have been utilized. However, previous methods required for large amounts of building and GIS information, and complex modeling and analysis processes, leading to significant time consumption. This paper proposed a static analysis-based rapid fire following earthquake assessment method using simple information and implemented it in Pohang City, South Korea. Based on previous studies, the best-fit model for the ignition rate estimation was selected, and a cluster-based fire-burned rate estimation model was developed using simple building information (e.g., construction year, building occupancy, story, and total floor area) from the public building database (e.g., building registration data). For the fire-burned rate estimation model, fire-resistant structure types were defined using simple building information, and this was utilized to generate clusters of buildings at a regional level by comparing fire-spread distances for each fire-resistant structure type with adjacent distances among the buildings. This proposed method was applied to Pohang City, South Korea, and validated as follows: (1) the selected ignition rate model predicted similar ignition numbers to the actual reported number (actual number of ignitions = 4 vs. predicted number of ignitions = 3), and (2) the fire-burned rate model estimated fire-burned areas with a marginal difference compared to the fire spread simulation (fire-burned area using the proposed model = 13,703.6 m2 vs. results of fire spread simulation = 16,800.0 m2, with an error of approximately 18%).
More Related Videos
10:52Simulation of Human-induced Vibrations Based on the Characterized In-field Pedestrian Behavior
Published on: April 13, 2016
08:09Measuring and Mapping Patterns of Soil Erosion and Deposition Related to Soil Carbonate Concentrations Under Agricultural Management
Published on: September 12, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Applications of GIS: Disaster Management and Emergency Response
Manipulation and Analysis
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Levels of Use of a GIS
Selected Data About Geographic Locations
Introduction to GIS