Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2025

Assessing the Coherence of Parents' Short Narratives Regarding their Child Using the Five-Minute Speech Sample Procedure
Published on: September 19, 2019
Why Didn't You Call Me? Factors Junior Learners Consider When Deciding Whether to Call Their Supervisor
Kameela Miriam Alibhai1, Taryn Raelene Zabolotniuk2, Isabelle Raîche1
1Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Objective:
Over half of junior learners (JL) feel pressure to work independently and report rarely calling their supervisor. It is unclear how JL decide whether or not to call their supervisor. The study aims to identify factors that JL consider when responding to clinical scenarios and deciding whether to call senior residents (SR) and compare them to factors identified by SR.
Methods:
Fifteen cognitive interviews were conducted with SR and JL. Participants were given 8 to 15 sample pages and probed regarding the factors they considered when triaging the page and deciding whether to inform a SR. De-identified interview transcripts were inductively coded using an interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) approach.
Setting:
Department of Surgery, Faculty of medicine at the University of Ottawa in Canada.
Participant:
Five general surgery SR and ten JL, which included 5 senior medical students and 5 general surgery junior residents.
Results:
JL and SR indicated a clear need to call SR when managing high acuity pages, which included hemodynamic instability, decreased level of consciousness, or codes (ie, trauma, cardiac arrest). In the absence of high acuity findings, JL judged whether to call SR based on 10 patient and learner-related factors. Patient-related factors include: 1) time since surgery, 2) patient appearance, 3) patient requires intervention, and 4) lack of improvement after initial independent management attempt. Learner-related factors were categorized into clinical (5-8) and social factors (9-10): 5) nurse's level of concern, 6) familiarity with the patient, 7) gut feeling, 8) prior experience managing this presentation, 9) time of day, and 10) interpersonal dynamic with SR. While SR identified all patient-related and clinical factors, they did not cite the 2 social factors JL considered.
Conclusion:
When pages lack high-acuity findings, JL consider various patient and learner factors when deciding whether to inform SR. Discussing these factors may help guide new JL regarding when they should call their supervisor. Understanding social factors is important to create a culture that minimizes their influence on JL's decision-making and promotes patient safety.
Related Concept Videos
Social Loafing
Factors Affecting Workability
Milgram's Obedience to Authority
Surveys
Obedience
Factors Affecting Perception
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...

