Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2025

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
Published on: January 17, 2013
Machine learning methods in physical therapy: A scoping review of applications in clinical context
Felipe J J Reis1, Matheus Bartholazzi Lugão de Carvalho2, Gabriela de Assis Neves2
1Physical Therapy Department, Instituto Federal do Rio de Janeiro (IFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil; School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Pain in Motion Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Background:
Machine learning (ML) efficiently processes large datasets, showing promise in enhancing clinical practice within physical therapy.
Objective:
The aim of this scoping review is to provide an overview of studies using ML approaches in clinical settings of physical therapy.
Data Sources:
A scoping review was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, PEDro, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus.
Selection Criteria:
We included studies utilizing ML methods. ML was defined as the utilization of computational systems to encode patterns and relationships, enabling predictions or classifications with minimal human interference.
Data Extraction And Data Synthesis:
Data were extracted regarding methods, data types, performance metrics, and model availability.
Results:
Forty-two studies were included. The majority were published after 2020 (n = 25). Fourteen studies (33.3%) were in the musculoskeletal physical therapy field, nine (21.4%) in neurological, and eight (19%) in sports physical therapy. We identified 44 different ML models, with random forest being the most used. Three studies reported on model availability. We identified several clinical applications for ML-based tools, including diagnosis (n = 14), prognosis (n = 7), treatment outcomes prediction (n = 7), clinical decision support (n = 5), movement analysis (n = 4), patient monitoring (n = 3), and personalized care plan (n = 2).
Limitation:
Model performance metrics, costs, model interpretability, and explainability were not reported.
Conclusion:
This scope review mapped the emerging landscape of machine learning applications in physical therapy. Despite the growing interest, the field still lacks high-quality studies on validation, model availability, and acceptability to advance from research to clinical practice.
More Related Videos
14:56The Combined Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Robotic Therapy for the Upper Limb
Published on: September 23, 2018
04:09Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: October 10, 2018