Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2025

Identifying Coronary Artery Calcification on Non-gated Computed Tomography Scans
Published on: August 28, 2018
Relationship between plaque burden and plaque vulnerability: Acute coronary syndromes versus chronic coronary
Daisuke Kinoshita1, Keishi Suzuki1, Daichi Fujimoto1
1Gill Gray Research Laboratory, Cardiology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Background:
The relationship between plaque burden and microscopic characterization of plaque features as it pertains to clinical presentation has not been fully investigated. The aim of this study was to compare the relationship between plaque burden and plaque vulnerability in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) versus chronic coronary syndrome (CCS).
Methods:
Patients who underwent both coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) before coronary intervention were enrolled. All plaques were detected in culprit vessels using CTA, and total plaque volume (TPV) and OCT features were assessed at the corresponding sites. All plaques were divided into three groups according to the tertile levels of TPV (low TPV: <96.5 mm3, moderate TPV: 96.5-164.7 mm3, high TPV: ≥164.8 mm3).
Results:
A total of 990 plaques were imaged by OCT in 419 patients: 445 plaques in 190 (45.3%) patients with ACS and 545 in 229 (54.7%) with CCS. Macrophage was more prevalent in plaques with greater TPV in patients who presented with ACS but not in those who presented with CCS (low vs. moderate vs. high TPV group: macrophage 57.4% vs. 71.8% vs. 82.4% in ACS; 63.4% vs. 67.8% vs. 66.7% in CCS; interaction P = 0.004). Lipid arc increased as TPV increased, especially in patients who presented with ACS. Conversely, the layer index increased as TPV increased in patients with CCS.
Conclusion:
Greater plaque burden was closely related to higher levels of plaque vulnerability in ACS and greater volume of layered plaque in CCS.
Trial Registration:
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT04523194.
More Related Videos
13:07Optical Coherence Tomography Based Biomechanical Fluid-Structure Interaction Analysis of Coronary Atherosclerosis Progression
Published on: January 15, 2022
10:02Quantification of Atherosclerotic Plaque Activity and Vascular Inflammation using [18-F] Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography FDG-PET/CT
Published on: May 2, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Ischemic Heart Disease: Overview
Atherosclerosis, the primary malefactor, orchestrates this dangerous condition. It manifests as the accumulation of fatty deposits, akin to insidious plaques, within arterial walls. As time elapses, these plaques metamorphose, hardening and...
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System II: CRP, Hcy, and Cardiac Natriuretic Peptide Markers
These markers indicate stress or strain on the heart muscle:
Natriuretic Peptides (BNP)
Cardiac myocytes produce these hormones in response to ventricular stretching...
Inflammation
Psychoneuroimmunology: Cardiovascular Disease
A key area of focus in PNI is the relationship between stress and coronary...
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Antianginal Drugs: Calcium Channel Blockers and Ranolazine
CCBs, a diverse class that includes dihydropyridines (nifedipine) and diphenylalkylamines (verapamil and diltiazem), exert their effect by blocking calcium channels in cardiac and smooth muscle cells. This...