Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2025
Point-Of-Care Ultrasound Screening for Proximal Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis
Published on: February 10, 2023
Venous thromboembolism prevention program implementation in a community oncology practice: a cohort study
Steven Ades1, Yonatan Resnick2, Jacob Barker3
1University of Vermont Cancer Center, 89 Beaumont Ave, Burlington, VT 05405, USA.
Background:
While national guidelines recommend Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) risk assessment in cancer outpatients and consideration of pharmacologic prophylaxis in high-risk patients, prophylaxis rates are low in community oncology practices. A successful model for guideline implementation (the Vermont Model, VM) is validated in an academic tertiary oncology setting. We undertook an implementation study to determine the success of this model in a multi-site community oncology practice. The study objectives were to: 1) adapt the VM to the community practice setting; 2) implement the adapted VM into practice; and 3) evaluate clinical and implementation outcomes.
Methods:
The study was carried out in three phases: (1) Pre-implementation, a multidisciplinary team addressed the need to adapt the VM to the local context including electronic medical record (EMR) optimisation and clinician education; (2) implementation of the strategies adapted to the local context, informed by VM and adapted based on stakeholder feedback; (3) prospective evaluation of clinical and implementation outcomes at six months after implementation.
Findings:
Following creation of a comprehensive initiation roadmap for the adaptation of VM program to the community practice, 302 cancer outpatients initiating new treatment met inclusion criteria over a 6 month implementation period. VTE risk education was provided to 100% of patients, and 98% (296) of patients received a VTE risk assessment. Of 52 patients (18%) who scored as high risk based on a modified Khorana (Protecht) score, 14 (27%) initiated prophylaxis. Barriers to program adaptation included EMR optimization challenges and practice-level responsibility assignment, time constraints, concern about potential drug interactions, and financial & insurance issues.
Interpretation:
Implementation of a multidisciplinary VTE prevention model in the community-based oncology setting successfully increased VTE education and risk assessment rates. AC prophylaxis rates were modestly increased, highlighting the need to understand and address barriers to anticoagulant prophylaxis prescribing in this setting.
Funding:
Northern New England Clinical Oncology Society Research Funding Program.
Related Concept Videos
01:15Nursing Implementation
The five steps to implementing effective nursing care include reassessing the patient, reviewing and revising the existing nursing care plan, organizing the resources and care delivery, anticipating and preventing complications, and implementing nursing interventions.
01:22Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
01:11Overview of Systemic Veins
The coronary sinus, the heart's principal vein, resides in the coronary sulcus on the heart's posterior aspect. This broad venous channel receives nearly all venous blood from the myocardium, the heart muscle. It is fed by three primary veins: the great cardiac vein, the...
01:26Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention
In primary prevention, actions taken before disease onset prevent the disease from...
02:56Treatment Resistant Cancers
01:23Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Prostacyclin Receptor Agonists
These agonists bind to the IPR receptor situated on the plasma membrane of the pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells. This binding triggers a cascade of reactions known as the GS-AC-cAMP-PKA pathway. This pathway results in the relaxation of smooth muscle...