Breathing motion compensation in chest tomosynthesis: evaluation of the effect on image quality and presence of
Maral Mirzai1,2, Jenny Nilsson1, Patrik Sund1,2
1Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Department of Medical Radiation Sciences, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Purpose:
Chest tomosynthesis (CTS) has a relatively longer acquisition time compared with chest X-ray, which may increase the risk of motion artifacts in the reconstructed images. Motion artifacts induced by breathing motion adversely impact the image quality. This study aims to reduce these artifacts by excluding projection images identified with breathing motion prior to the reconstruction of section images and to assess if motion compensation improves overall image quality.
Approach:
In this study, 2969 CTS examinations were analyzed to identify examinations where breathing motion has occurred using a method based on localizing the diaphragm border in each of the projection images. A trajectory over diaphragm positions was estimated from a second-order polynomial curve fit, and projection images where the diaphragm border deviated from the trajectory were removed before reconstruction. The image quality between motion-compensated and uncompensated examinations was evaluated using the image quality criteria for anatomical structures and image artifacts in a visual grading characteristic (VGC) study. The resulting rating data were statistically analyzed using the software VGC analyzer.
Results:
A total of 58 examinations were included in this study with breathing motion occurring either at the beginning or end ( ) or throughout the entire acquisition ( ). In general, no significant difference in image quality or presence of motion artifacts was shown between the motion-compensated and uncompensated examinations. However, motion compensation significantly improved the image quality and reduced the motion artifacts in cases where motion occurred at the beginning or end. In examinations where motion occurred throughout the acquisition, motion compensation led to a significant increase in ripple artifacts and noise.
Conclusions:
Compensation for respiratory motion in CTS by excluding projection images may improve the image quality if the motion occurs mainly at the beginning or end of the examination. However, the disadvantages of excluding projections may outweigh the benefits of motion compensation.
More Related Videos
05:07Author Spotlight: Optimized Lung MRI Protocol with Computationally Efficient Reconstruction Methods
Published on: September 6, 2024
08:35Oxygenation-sensitive Cardiac MRI with Vasoactive Breathing Maneuvers for the Non-invasive Assessment of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction
Published on: August 17, 2022
Related Concept Videos
01:10Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
01:30Assessment of Airway, Skin Color, and Use of Accessory Muscles
Introduction
The initial evaluation of a patient's respiratory system...
01:20Assessment of Ventilation I: Respiratory Rate
A Ventilation assessment is critical for monitoring a patient's health status. Respiration, one of the most accessible vital signs, provides insights into the function of numerous body systems and can indicate serious health issues, such as brainstem injuries from head trauma.
Critical Guidelines for Assessing Ventilation:
01:23Assessment of Respiration
Subjective Assessment: Nurses interview the patient to gather information directly during the subjective assessment. It includes questions about the individual's medical history, medications, and symptoms, focusing on past respiratory conditions like...