Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system.

W A Knaus, E A Draper, D P Wagner

    Critical Care Medicine
    |October 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Health Heritage© a web-based tool for the collection and assessment of family health history: initial user experience and analytic validity.

    Public health genomics·2010
    Same author

    Antibiotics for severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

    Lancet (London, England)·2002
    Same author

    Comparison of the performance of two comorbidity measures, with and without information from prior hospitalizations.

    Medical care·2001
    Same author

    Cannot draw generic conclusions from a single study.

    Critical care medicine·2001
    Same author

    The importance of bacterial sepsis in intensive care unit patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome: implications for future care in the age of increasing antiretroviral resistance.

    Critical care medicine·2001
    Same author

    Intensive care unit length of stay: recent changes and future challenges.

    Critical care medicine·2000
    Same journal

    The authors reply.

    Critical care medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Attracting Emergency Medicine Graduates to Surgical Critical Care Training Programs.

    Critical care medicine·2026
    Same journal

    The authors reply.

    Critical care medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Beyond a Snapshot: Tracking Family Prognostic Expectations in the ICU.

    Critical care medicine·2026
    Same journal

    The authors reply.

    Critical care medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Plasma Levels of Soluble ST2 Reflect Extrapulmonary Organ Dysfunction and Predict Outcomes in Acute Respiratory Failure: Beware of Potential Confounders.

    Critical care medicine·2026
    See all related articles

    The APACHE II scoring system accurately predicts hospital death risk in intensive care units. This validated severity of disease classification aids in patient stratification and therapy comparison.

    Area of Science:

    • Critical Care Medicine
    • Health Services Research
    • Biostatistics

    Background:

    • Assessing disease severity is crucial for patient management and research in intensive care.
    • Existing methods may lack comprehensive or validated measures for predicting patient outcomes.
    • The need for a standardized, reliable scoring system to evaluate intensive care unit (ICU) performance and therapeutic interventions.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To present the development and validation of the APACHE II (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II) scoring system.
    • To establish APACHE II as a general measure of disease severity.
    • To demonstrate its utility in stratifying risk and comparing therapeutic outcomes.

    Main Methods:

    • Utilized initial values from 12 routine physiologic measurements.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Incorporated patient age and previous health status into the scoring algorithm.
  • Validated the system on 5815 intensive care admissions across 13 hospitals.
  • Main Results:

    • An increasing APACHE II score (0-71) strongly correlated with the risk of hospital death.
    • This correlation was observed across various common diseases.
    • The system demonstrated prognostic stratification capabilities for acutely ill patients.

    Conclusions:

    • APACHE II provides a validated, general measure of disease severity.
    • The scoring system can effectively stratify patients and aid in comparing therapeutic efficacy.
    • APACHE II is a valuable tool for evaluating ICU resource utilization and inter-hospital comparisons.