Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2025

A Duplex Digital PCR Assay for Simultaneous Quantification of the Enterococcus spp. and the Human Fecal-associated HF183 Marker in Waters
Published on: March 9, 2016
Droplet digital PCR for fish pathogen detection and quantification: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Md Afsar Ahmed Sumon1, Edinson Dante Meregildo-Rodriguez2, Po-Tsang Lee3
1Department of Animal and Aquatic Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) shows promise for detecting aquatic pathogens. While sensitivity is comparable to quantitative PCR (qPCR), ddPCR offers precise quantification without standard curves, enhancing diagnostic accuracy in aquaculture.
Area of Science:
- Aquatic microbiology
- Molecular diagnostics
- Veterinary medicine
Background:
- Aquaculture faces significant economic losses due to viral and bacterial pathogens.
- Accurate and sensitive pathogen detection is crucial for disease management and prevention in fish farming.
- Quantitative PCR (qPCR) is a common method, but droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) offers potential advantages.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and meta-analyze the diagnostic efficacy of ddPCR for detecting viral and bacterial pathogens in aquaculture.
- To compare the performance of ddPCR with qPCR in aquaculture pathogen detection.
- To assess the heterogeneity and risk of bias in studies evaluating ddPCR for aquaculture diagnostics.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature search of four databases up to November 6, 2023.
- Inclusion of 16 studies, with seven undergoing meta-analysis of 1121 biological samples.
- Adherence to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA) guidelines and QUADAS-C criteria.
Main Results:
- Pooled sensitivity for ddPCR was 0.750 (95% CI: 0.487-0.944), compared to 0.461 (95% CI: 0.294-0.632) for qPCR, with no significant difference (p=0.5884).
- Significant heterogeneity was observed (I²=93%-97%, p<0.01), influenced by publication year but not country.
- Low risk of bias and no detected publication bias across the included studies.
Conclusions:
- ddPCR demonstrates comparable sensitivity to qPCR for aquaculture pathogen detection.
- ddPCR's ability to quantify pathogens precisely without standard curves enhances diagnostic reliability.
- ddPCR holds significant potential for improving accuracy in aquaculture disease surveillance and management.
More Related Videos
07:47Reverse Transcription Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification RT-LAMP Assay for the Specific and Rapid Detection of Tilapia Lake Virus
Published on: May 18, 2020
07:54Two-Step Reverse Transcription Droplet Digital PCR Protocols for SARS-CoV-2 Detection and Quantification
Published on: March 31, 2021