Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2025
3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects
Published on: August 4, 2020
Point-of-Care 3-Dimensional-Printed Polyetheretherketone Customized Implants for Cranioplastic Surgery of Large Skull
Johannes P Pöppe1, Mathias Spendel1, Christoph J Griessenauer1
1Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg , Austria.
Background And Objectives:
3-Dimensional (3D) printing has become a common tool to aid implant molding for cranioplastic surgery of large skull defects. Until now, 3D printing of cranial implants itself has not been used, mainly because of medicolegal concerns. With a 3D printer developed for printing medical applications and with implant-grade polyetheretherketone (PEEK) filament available, we established a workflow (in compliance with medical device regulations) to 3D print cranial implants for cranioplastic surgery directly at the point of care (POC). Here, we describe the implementation of 3D printing these PEEK implants for cranioplastic surgery at our academic hospital.
Methods:
A thorough design and 3D printing process, in accordance with local medical device regulations, was developed. Implants are digitally designed based upon pre- and post-craniectomy cranial computed tomography scans by trained 3D printing experts from the department of medical engineering at our institution. Implants are then produced on a medical 3D printer with implant-grade PEEK filament using the fused filament fabrication process. After postprocessing and steam sterilization, implantation for reconstruction of the skull can be performed.
Results:
Cranioplastic surgery with a 3D-printed PEEK implant was performed at our institution in a patient with a large frontotemporoparietal skull defect after traumatic brain injury with consecutive decompressive craniectomy. No intra- or post-operative complications occurred. Postoperative cranial computed tomography scans showed perfect reconstruction of precraniectomy skull shape. The aesthetic result was promising and satisfactory to the patient.
Conclusion:
This novel 3D printing workflow enables the production of patient-specific cranial implants from PEEK, to reconstruct large skull defects directly at the POC in accordance with the European Medical Device Regulation. This marks an unprecedented technological and legal advancement, enabling the hospital infrastructure not only to deliver the cranioplastic surgery itself, but also additive manufacturing of the implant directly at the POC.
