Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2025
Cone Beam Intraoperative Computed Tomography-based Image Guidance for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion
Published on: August 6, 2019
Analysis of operative duration of image-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer
Yoshiaki Takagawa1,2,3, Masanori Machida4,5, Ichiro Seto4,5
1Department of Minimally Invasive Surgical and Medical Oncology, Fukushima Medical University, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima-shi, 960-1295, Fukushima, Japan. yoshiaki.takagawa@rad.med.keio.ac.jp.
Purpose:
The present study aimed to analyze the operative duration of image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT) for cervical cancer performed at our institution.
Methods:
We enrolled cervical cancer patients who had undergone tandem and ovoid-based intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) or intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy (IC/ISBT) between 2020 and 2024. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), CT, or CT + MRI were used for IGBT. For each IGBT session, we retrospectively reviewed the following: application time (AT-defined as the duration from entry into the operating room to the initial image acquisition); planning time (PT-defined as the duration from the initial image acquisition to the start of irradiation); and total operation time (TOT- defined as the duration from entry to exit of the operating room).
Results:
We analyzed a total of 126 sessions in 36 patients, consisting of 99 ICBT-only sessions and 27 IC/ISBT sessions. The IC/ISBT sessions had a significantly longer mean operative duration than the ICBT-only sessions. The IC/ISBT sessions with three or more interstitial needles had significantly longer AT and TOT. However, the IC/ISBT sessions with one needle showed no significant difference in operative duration compared to ICBT-only sessions. CBCT, CT, and CT + MRI were used in 42, 76, and 8 sessions, respectively. In the ICBT patients, CT + MRI had the longest PT. However, there was no significant differences in TOT among CBCT, CT, and CT + MRI.
Conclusions:
IC/ISBT sessions with one needle had no significant difference in operative duration compared to ICBT-only sessions. There was no significant difference in TOT between CT + MRI-based IGBT and CT-based IGBT.
