Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2025

Estimation of Urinary Nanocrystals in Humans using Calcium Fluorophore Labeling and Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis
Published on: February 9, 2021
The direct inhibitory effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus, a commensal urinary bacterium, on calcium oxalate stone
Chadanat Noonin1, Anantaya Putpim1,2, Visith Thongboonkerd3
1Medical Proteomics Unit, Research Department, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Background:
Lactobacillus acidophilus is a commensal urinary bacterium found more abundantly in healthy individuals than in stone patients. Hence, it has been proposed to play an inhibitory role in kidney stone disease (KSD) but with unclear mechanisms. We therefore investigated the direct effects of L. acidophilus on calcium oxalate (CaOx) stone development compared with Escherichia coli, which is known to promote CaOx stone formation.
Results:
L. acidophilus at 1 × 103 CFU/ml significantly reduced the abundance of newly formed crystals, enlargement and aggregation of seeded crystals, and crystal adhesion on renal cell membranes. By contrast, E. coli at 1 × 103 CFU/ml significantly enhanced crystal growth and aggregation but did not affect crystallization and crystal-cell adhesion. Oxalate consumption assay showed that neither L. acidophilus nor E. coli significantly reduced the remaining oxalate level after 1 - 3 h incubation. However, both of them adhered to CaOx crystals. Surface component detection revealed that only L. acidophilus expressed S-layer protein, whereas only E. coli exhibited flagella on their surfaces. Removal of L. acidophilus S-layer protein and E. coli flagella completely abolished the inhibitory and promoting effects of L. acidophilus and E. coli, respectively.
Conclusions:
L. acidophilus inhibits CaOx stone development by hampering crystallization, growth, aggregation and cell-adhesive ability of CaOx. By contrast, E. coli enhances CaOx stone development by promoting CaOx growth and aggregation. Their contradictory effects are most likely from differential surface components (i.e., S-layer protein on L. acidophilus and flagella on E. coli) not from oxalate-degrading ability. Video Abstract.
Related Concept Videos
Acid Suppressive Drugs for Peptic Ulcer Disease: Antacids
However, this neutralization reaction between...
Acid Suppressive Drugs for Peptic Ulcer Disease: Proton Pump Inhibitors
Gastric acid, a potent cocktail of hydrogen and chloride ions, is produced in specialized parietal cells within the...
Antihypertensive Drugs: Action of Calcium Channel Blockers
Acid Suppressive Drugs for Peptic Ulcer Disease: Histamine H2-Receptor Antagonists
Drugs for Treatment of Constipation-Predominant IBS
Pathophysiology of Peptic Ulcer Disease: Mucosal Defense Factors

