Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 1, 2025

Comprehensive Echocardiographic Assessment of Right Ventricle Function in a Rat Model of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Published on: January 20, 2023
Sex-Related Differences in Left Ventricular Geometry Patterns in Patients With Arterial Hypertension
Grazia Canciello1, Raffaele Piccolo1, Raffaele Izzo1
1Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Insights
Women with hypertension show higher risks of left ventricular (LV) remodeling compared to men. These sex-specific differences in LV geometry persist over time, impacting hypertension management strategies.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Hypertension Research
- Sex-Specific Medicine
Background:
- Sex-specific differences in left ventricular (LV) geometry are crucial for developing tailored hypertension management strategies.
- Understanding these differences can lead to more personalized and effective treatments for hypertensive patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate sex-related differences in left ventricular (LV) geometry.
- To assess changes in LV geometry over time in patients with hypertension.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of a prospective registry of hypertensive patients without pre-existing cardiovascular disease or severe kidney disease.
- Definition of LV hypertrophy (LVH) based on LV mass index and LV concentric geometry based on relative wall thickness.
- Categorization of LV remodeling as concentric LVH or eccentric LVH.
Main Results:
- Females exhibited a lower prevalence of normal LV geometry and a higher prevalence of LVH at baseline compared to males.
- Female sex was independently associated with a higher risk of LV remodeling (OR: 2.36).
- These sex-related differences in LV geometry and remodeling persisted at long-term follow-up.
Conclusions:
- Significant sex-related differences in LV geometry exist among hypertensive individuals.
- Females face a higher risk of LV remodeling at baseline, a disparity that continues throughout long-term follow-up.
- Findings underscore the need for sex-specific approaches in managing hypertension and its cardiac consequences.
Background:
Sex-specific differences in left ventricular (LV) geometry might help in developing tailored strategies for hypertension management.
Objectives:
The purpose of the study was to evaluate sex-related differences in LV geometry at baseline and over time in hypertension.
Methods:
From a prospective registry, we included hypertensives without prevalent cardiovascular disease, incident myocardial infarction, chronic kidney disease > stage III, and with normal LV ejection fraction. LV mass index >115 g/m2 in males and >95 g/m2 in females, identified LV hypertrophy (LVH). Relative wall thickness ≥0.43 defined LV concentric geometry. LVH in presence of concentric geometry was defined as concentric LVH, whereas relative wall thickness <0.43 was categorized as eccentric. Concentric geometry, or LVH, identified LV remodeling.
Results:
Six thousand four hundred twenty-seven patients (age 53 ± 11 years, 43% females) were included. At baseline, females showed lower prevalence of normal geometric pattern and higher prevalence of LVH than males (50% vs 72%, P < 0.001; 47% vs 23%, P < 0.001, respectively), with a higher prevalence of eccentric LVH (40% vs 18%, P < 0.001). Female sex was independently associated with LV remodeling (OR: 2.36; 95% CI: 2.12-2.62; P < 0.001). At long-term follow-up (mean 6.1 years, IQR: 2.8-8.6 years), prevalence of LV remodeling increased in both sexes, although a normal LV geometry remained less frequent in females than males (43% vs 67%, P < 0.001), with differences persisting in eccentric (41% vs 21%, P < 0.001) and concentric LVH (11% vs 5%, P < 0.001).
Conclusions:
We found sex-related differences in LV geometry among hypertensives. Females have higher risk of LV remodeling at baseline compared with males, with differences persisting at long-term follow-up.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests

