Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators Among Older Survivors of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Mason Marcus1, Paul S Chan2, Anping Chang3
1University of Texas-Southwestern Medical Center Dallas TX USA.
Insights
Fewer than one-third of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors with a shockable rhythm received an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). ICD use varied significantly across hospitals, independent of patient factors, highlighting a need for improved secondary prevention strategies.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Public Health
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Current guidelines recommend implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) for secondary prevention in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survivors.
- Contemporary data on ICD utilization in this population remain limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine contemporary rates of secondary-prevention ICD implantation in OHCA survivors with a shockable rhythm.
- To identify patient-level factors associated with ICD implantation.
- To quantify hospital variation in ICD implantation rates.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 3226 OHCA survivors (aged ≥65 years) with a shockable rhythm from the 2013-2019 Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES) linked to Medicare.
- Multivariable hierarchical regression models were used to assess associations between patient variables and ICD implantation and hospital variation.
- Outcomes included ICD implantation before discharge, at 90 days, and within 6 months.
Main Results:
- Overall, 30.9% of eligible survivors received an ICD before discharge.
- Older age, female sex, diabetes, and presentation with acute myocardial infarction were associated with lower odds of ICD implantation.
- No significant association was found between race/ethnicity and ICD implantation.
- Significant hospital variation in ICD implantation rates was observed, with a 62% difference in odds after adjusting for case mix.
Conclusions:
- Less than one-third of OHCA survivors with a shockable rhythm received a secondary-prevention ICD before discharge.
- Patient factors, but not race or ethnicity, were associated with ICD implantation.
- Marked variation in ICD implantation exists across hospitals, even after adjusting for patient characteristics.
Background:
Although current guidelines recommend implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) placement in survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, contemporary data on secondary-prevention ICDs in survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest remain limited.
Methods And Results:
Using 2013 to 2019 CARES (Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival) linked to Medicare, we identified 3226 patients aged ≥65 years with an initial shockable rhythm who survived to discharge without severe neurological disability. Multivariable hierarchical regression models were used to examine the association between patient variables and ICD placement and quantify hospital variation in ICD implantation. The mean age was 72.2 years, 23.5% were women, 10% were Black individuals, and 4% were Hispanic individuals. Overall, 997 (30.9%) patients received an ICD before discharge, 1266 (39.2%) at 90 days, and 1287 (39.9%) within 6 months. Older age (≥85 years), female sex, history of diabetes, calendar year, and presentation with acute myocardial infarction were associated with lower odds of ICD implantation, but race or ethnicity was not associated with ICD implantation. Among 297 hospitals, the median proportion of survivors receiving ICD at discharge was 28.6% (interquartile range, 20%-50%). The relative odds of ICD implantation varied by 62% across hospitals (median odds ratio, 1.62 [95% CI, 1.38-1.82]) after adjusting for case mix.
Conclusions:
Fewer than 1 in 3 survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to a shockable rhythm received a secondary-prevention ICD before discharge. Although patient variables were associated with ICD implantation, there was no difference by race or ethnicity. Even after adjusting for patient case mix, ICD implantation varied markedly across hospitals.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care

