AutoPeptideML: a study on how to build more trustworthy peptide bioactivity predictors

Automated machine learning (AutoML) solutions can bridge the gap between new computational advances and their real-world applications by enabling experimental scientists to build their own custom models. We examine different steps in the development life-cycle of peptide bioactivity binary predictors and identify key steps where automation cannot only result in a more accessible method, but also more robust and interpretable evaluation leading to more trustworthy models.

We present a new automated method for drawing negative peptides that achieves better balance between specificity and generalization than current alternatives. We study the effect of homology-based partitioning for generating the training and testing data subsets and demonstrate that model performance is overestimated when no such homology correction is used, which indicates that prior studies may have overestimated their performance when applied to new peptide sequences. We also conduct a systematic analysis of different protein language models as peptide representation methods and find that they can serve as better descriptors than a naive alternative, but that there is no significant difference across models with different sizes or algorithms. Finally, we demonstrate that an ensemble of optimized traditional machine learning algorithms can compete with more complex neural network models, while being more computationally efficient. We integrate these findings into AutoPeptideML, an easy-to-use AutoML tool to allow researchers without a computational background to build new predictive models for peptide bioactivity in a matter of minutes.

Source code, documentation, and data are available at https://github.com/IBM/AutoPeptideML and a dedicated web-server at http://peptide.ucd.ie/AutoPeptideML. A static version of the software to ensure the reproduction of the results is available at https://zenodo.org/records/13363975.