Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2026
Endaural Endoscopic Atticoantrotomy Retrograde Mastoidectomy using a Constant Suction Bone-drilling Technique
Published on: May 23, 2021
Classification of Microtia With Unusable Remnant Ear and Techniques in the First Stage of Two-Stage Auricular
Bei He1, Bingqing Wang, Qingguo Zhang
1From the Department of Ear Reconstruction, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People Republic of China.
Background:
The remnant ear is a very important material in auricular reconstruction surgery; its dimension, position, and shape determine how it is used. However, the local conditions of microtia patients are complex and variable. Situations may be encountered where a series of abnormal remnant ears cannot be utilized in clinical practice. Currently, there are no literature that elaborates on this type of microtia and provides systematic treatment methods. The purpose of this article is to systematically classify them and optimize the two-stage method auricular reconstruction, to provide an effective surgical method for these patients.
Methods:
Based on the size, shape, and relative position of the residual ears, the unusable remnant ears were classified into three types: tiny size, abnormal shape, and relative position anomaly (over 1-cm higher than the contralateral earlobe). Fifty-three microtia patients with unusable remnant ear (54 ears) who underwent two-stage auricular reconstruction from August 2020 to August 2023 were reviewed. All patients had experienced earlobe reconstruction by using autologous rib cartilage during the first stage of surgery. Aesthetic assessments were evaluated from the naturalness of the earlobe reconstructed with autologous rib cartilage and the connection with the overall framework. The data on any complications that occurred during the follow-up period and patient satisfaction were collected.
Results:
Among all patients, 31 had tiny size, 14 had abnormal shape, and 8 had excessively high positions. Patients were followed up for an average period of 9.2 months (6 to 12 months). No complex complications such as infection, skin necrosis, or cartilage exposure occurred. Fifty patients (94.3%) achieved excellent or good aesthetic outcomes. Fifty-one patients (96.2%) were satisfied with the reconstruction outcomes.
Conclusions:
An accurate assessment of the residual ear preoperatively is essential. Reconstructing and splicing the earlobe with autologous rib cartilage in cases where the residual ear cannot be utilized compensate for the defect that the soft tissue cannot provide the earlobe flap. This is an effective surgical method for the ear reconstruction in such patients.
