Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2025

Systems Biology of Metabolic Regulation by Estrogen Receptor Signaling in Breast Cancer
Published on: March 17, 2016
Oral SERDs changing the scenery in hormone receptor positive breast cancer, a comprehensive review
Mathilde Gheysen1, Kevin Punie2, Hans Wildiers1
1Department of General Medical Oncology and Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Background:
Primary and acquired endocrine resistance remains a major issue in the treatment of hormone receptor positive breast cancer. Acquired resistance often results from estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) mutations leading to estrogen independent estrogen receptor activation. Selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) induce degradation of this receptor, thereby overcoming this resistance. The intramuscular administration and modest efficacy of fulvestrant, the first SERD, triggered development of oral, more potent SERDs. This narrative review gives an overview of the current evidence regarding this new drug class.
Methods:
Medline/PubMed and Embase database were screened using a systematic search strategy. We assessed the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium abstract reports, the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) meeting resources by applying the following terms: 'SERD', 'giredestrant', 'elacestrant', 'imlunestrant', 'amcenestrant', 'camizestrant' and 'rintodestrant'.
Clinicaltrials:
gov was consulted to include ongoing trials.
Results:
The search retrieved 1191 articles. After screening, 108 articles were retained. In the phase 3 EMERALD trial, elacestrant demonstrated benefit in progression free survival (PFS) in second line metastatic disease in postmenopausal women or men, leading to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) approval for the ESR1 mutated population. This PFS advantage was more pronounced among patients who had priorly received at least 12 months of a cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i). In the phase 2 SERENA-2 trial, camizestrant improved PFS as second line treatment. However, trials of giredestrant and amcenestrant failed to show PFS benefit in second line metastatic setting. In the preoperative setting, several oral SERDs resulted in a significant reduction of tumoral proliferation. Furthermore, many trials are still in progress.
Conclusion:
Oral SERDs constitute an exciting new drug class. Ongoing and future research will further refine the role of these drugs next to standard endocrine treatments and targeted therapies.
Insights
New oral selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) show promise in treating hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, particularly those with ESR1 mutations. Elacestrant and camizestrant demonstrated benefits in progression-free survival in clinical trials.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Endocrinology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Endocrine resistance is a significant challenge in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer treatment.
- Estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) mutations can drive estrogen-independent receptor activation, leading to acquired resistance.
- Oral selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) are being developed to overcome resistance to therapies like fulvestrant.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide a narrative review of the current evidence on oral SERDs for breast cancer treatment.
- To summarize the efficacy and safety of novel oral SERDs in various clinical settings.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was conducted using Medline/PubMed and Embase.
- Relevant terms included 'SERD', 'giredestrant', 'elacestrant', 'imlunestrant', 'amcenestrant', 'camizestrant', and 'rintodestrant'.
- Abstracts from major oncology conferences (SABCS, ESMO, ASCO) and clinical trial registries were also assessed.
Main Results:
- Elacestrant gained FDA and EMA approval for ESR1-mutated metastatic breast cancer, showing improved progression-free survival (PFS), especially after CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy.
- Camizestrant demonstrated PFS benefit in the second-line metastatic setting.
- Giredestrant and amcenestrant trials did not show PFS benefit in the second-line metastatic setting.
- Several oral SERDs showed significant reduction in tumoral proliferation in the preoperative setting.
- Numerous clinical trials are ongoing for oral SERDs.
Conclusions:
- Oral SERDs represent a promising new class of drugs for breast cancer.
- Further research is needed to define the optimal role of oral SERDs in combination with existing treatments.
More Related Videos
10:39Using Mouse Mammary Tumor Cells to Teach Core Biology Concepts: A Simple Lab Module
Published on: June 18, 2015
08:59Looking for Driver Pathways of Acquired Resistance to Targeted Therapy: Drug Resistant Subclone Generation and Sensitivity Restoring by Gene Knock-down
Published on: December 11, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Transducer Mechanism: Nuclear Receptors
About 48 different soluble family members of nuclear receptors are identified that can be divided into two main classes:
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Structure-Activity Relationships and Drug Design
SAR studies the intricate relationship between a drug's chemical structure and biological activity. It focuses on understanding how modifications to a drug's structure can influence...
Transducer Mechanism: Enzyme-Linked Receptors
Major types that are helpful drug targets include: