Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 13, 2026
Epidural Intracranial Pressure Measurement in Rats Using a Fiber-optic Pressure Transducer
Published on: April 25, 2012
Noninvasive Method Using Mechanical Extensometer for the Estimation of Intracranial Compliance by Repeated Measures
Sanem Pinar Uysal1, Hayley G Williams2, Mina Huerta3
1Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA. sanempinaruysal@gmail.com.
Background:
Intracranial compliance refers to the relationship between changes in volume and the resultant changes in intracranial pressure (ICP). This study aimed to assess the agreement of a noninvasive ICP waveform device for the estimation of compliance compared with invasive ICP monitoring employing three distinct methods.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective analysis of ICP waveform morphology recorded through both invasive (external ventricular drain) and noninvasive (mechanical extensometer) methods in adult patients with acute brain injury admitted to a neurointensive care unit between August 2021 and August 2022. Compliance was calculated as the amplitude of the fundamental component of cerebral arterial blood volume (estimated with concurrent Transcranial Doppler [TCD] recordings), divided by the amplitude of the fundamental component of the invasive and noninvasive ICP waveforms. Subsequently, we assessed the agreement between invasive and noninvasive intracranial compliance by repeated measures correlation coefficient analysis using three methods: TCD-derived, P2/P1 ratio, and time-to-peak (TTP). A linear mixed-effects model was used to compute the concordance correlation coefficient, total deviation index, and coefficient of individual agreement. Coverage probability plot was calculated to estimate the percent of observations within different cut points for each of the three methods.
Results:
A total of 21 patients were identified for this study. Repeated measures correlation analysis showed a strong correlation (R = 0.982, 95% confidence interval [0.980-0.984], p < 0.0001) between log-transformed noninvasive and invasive compliance. Agreement statistics for TCD, P2/P1 ratio, and TTP indicated that although the concordance correlation coefficient was highest for log(TCD) values, TTP and P2:P1 ratio measures had better agreement with total deviation index and coverage probability plot analyses.
Conclusions:
Repeated measures correlations suggest that ICP waveform analyses may offer a more accurate estimate of compliance than TCD-derived methods for noninvasive ICP monitoring. Further validations studies are warranted to confidently establish this method as an indicator of intracranial compliance.
