Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2025

Author Spotlight: Efficient Image Recognition Using Directional Gradient Histogram Technique and Support Vector Machines
Published on: January 5, 2024
Developing effective optimized machine learning approaches for settlement prediction of shallow foundation
Mohammad Khajehzadeh1,2, Suraparb Keawsawasvong1, Viroon Kamchoom3
1Research Unit in Sciences and Innovative Technologies for Civil Engineering Infrastructures, Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Thammasat School of Engineering, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, 12120, Thailand.
Abstract:
The precise assessment of shallow foundation settlement on cohesionless soils is a challenging geotechnical issue, primarily due to the significant uncertainties related to the factors influencing the settlement. This study aims to create an advanced hybrid machine learning methodology for accurately estimating shallow foundations' settlement (Sm). The initial contribution of the current research is developing and validating a robust hybrid optimization methodology based on an artificial electric field and single candidate optimizer (AEFSCO). This approach is thoroughly tested using various benchmark functions. AEFSCO will also be used to optimize three useful machine learning methods: long short-term memory (LSTM), support vector regression (SVR), and multilayer perceptron neural network (MLPNN) by adjusting their hyperparameters for predicting the settlement of shallow foundations. A database consisting of 189 individual case histories, conducted through various investigations, was used for training and testing the models. The database includes five input parameters and one output. These factors encompassed both the geometric characteristics of the foundation and the properties of the sandy soil. The results demonstrate that employing effective optimization strategies to adjust the ML models' hyperparameters can significantly improve the accuracy of predicted results. The AEFSCO has increased the coefficient of determination (R2) value of the MLPNN model by 9.3 %, the SVR model by 8 %, and the LSTM model by 22 %. Also, the LSTM-AEFSCO model is more accurate than the SVR-AEFSCO and MLPNN-AEFSCO models. This is shown by the fact that R2 went from 0.9494 to 0.9290 to 0.9903, which is an increase of 4.5 % and 6 %.
Related Concept Videos
Design Example: Maintaining Level of an Embankment
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
Survival Tree
Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
Shrinkage in Concrete
When concrete is still in its plastic state, it can undergo a decrease in volume by about 1% of its absolute volume. This decrease is known as plastic shrinkage. It arises either...
Types of Building Separation Joints
Volume-change joints address the effects of expansion and contraction due to temperature and moisture variations. They are strategically placed at discontinuities in a building's mass where cracking is most likely and are spaced about 150 to 200...
Placing Concrete
While placing concrete, care is taken to ensure that the concrete is laid in uniform layers, and hand shoveling and moving concrete using poker vibrators is avoided. Also,...

