Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2025

Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device
Published on: November 8, 2024
Assessing the Performance of Models from the 2022 RSNA Cervical Spine Fracture Detection Competition at a Level I
Zixuan Hu1, Markand Patel1, Robyn L Ball1
1From the Edward S. Rogers Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering (Z.H., W.L., E.S.), Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine (M.P., S.M., R.M., E.C.), Faculty of Medicine (M.N., J.W., C.W.), and Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery (J.W., C.W.), University of Toronto, 40 St George St, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 3G4; Department of Medical Imaging (H.M.L., M.N., S.M., R.M., E.C.) and Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute (S.M., J.W., C.W., E.C.), St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada; The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine (R.L.B.); Standard School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (K.W.Y.); H2O.ai, Mountain View, Calif (Q.H., P.S., P.P.); School of Computer Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK (H.C.); DoubleYard, Edulab Group, Boston, Ireland (D.H.); Mapbox, London, UK (S.S.); NVIDIA, Santa Clara, Calif (C.H.); Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (I.P.); University of London, Goldsmiths, London, UK (H.S.); Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio (L.M.P.); Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pa (A.E.F.); Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, Brazil (F.C.K.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (J.T.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (T.R.); and North York General Hospital, Toronto, Canada (E.S.).
None:
Purpose To evaluate the performance of the top models from the RSNA 2022 Cervical Spine Fracture Detection challenge on a clinical test dataset of both noncontrast and contrast-enhanced CT scans acquired at a level I trauma center. Materials and Methods Seven top-performing models in the RSNA 2022 Cervical Spine Fracture Detection challenge were retrospectively evaluated on a clinical test set of 1828 CT scans (from 1829 series: 130 positive for fracture, 1699 negative for fracture; 1308 noncontrast, 521 contrast enhanced) from 1779 patients (mean age, 55.8 years ± 22.1 [SD]; 1154 [64.9%] male patients). Scans were acquired without exclusion criteria over 1 year (January-December 2022) from the emergency department of a neurosurgical and level I trauma center. Model performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. False-positive and false-negative cases were further analyzed by a neuroradiologist. Results Although all seven models showed decreased performance on the clinical test set compared with the challenge dataset, the models maintained high performances. On noncontrast CT scans, the models achieved a mean AUC of 0.89 (range: 0.79-0.92), sensitivity of 67.0% (range: 30.9%-80.0%), and specificity of 92.9% (range: 82.1%-99.0%). On contrast-enhanced CT scans, the models had a mean AUC of 0.88 (range: 0.76-0.94), sensitivity of 81.9% (range: 42.7%-100.0%), and specificity of 72.1% (range: 16.4%-92.8%). The models identified 10 fractures missed by radiologists. False-positive cases were more common in contrast-enhanced scans and observed in patients with degenerative changes on noncontrast scans, while false-negative cases were often associated with degenerative changes and osteopenia. Conclusion The winning models from the 2022 RSNA AI Challenge demonstrated a high performance for cervical spine fracture detection on a clinical test dataset, warranting further evaluation for their use as clinical support tools. Keywords: Feature Detection, Supervised Learning, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Genetic Algorithms, CT, Spine, Technology Assessment, Head/Neck Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2024 See also commentary by Levi and Politi in this issue.

