Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2025

Use of a Psychophysiological Script-driven Imagery Experiment to Study Trauma-related Dissociation in Borderline Personality Disorder
Published on: March 8, 2018
Levels and Changes in Defensive Firearm Use by US Crime Victims, 1987‒2021
David McDowall1, Brian Wiersema1, Colin Loftin1
1David McDowall and Colin Loftin are with the School of Criminal Justice and the Violence Research Group, University at Albany‒State University of New York (SUNY), Albany, NY. Brian Wiersema is with the Violence Research Group, University at Albany‒SUNY. Richard McCleary is with the Department of Criminology, Law, and Society, School of Social Ecology, University of California, Irvine.
Defensive gun use by crime victims in the US remained infrequent and stable over 35 years. These findings suggest claims of widespread firearm ownership benefits may be overstated.
Area of Science:
- Criminology
- Public Health
- Sociology
Background:
- Understanding the frequency of defensive gun use (DGU) is crucial for evaluating firearm policies.
- Previous research has yielded varied estimates of DGU, necessitating updated analysis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze trends in the frequency of defensive gun use by crime victims in the United States.
- To compare DGU rates across different crime types (personal vs. household).
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from the US Bureau of Justice Statistics National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS).
- Calculated national-level counts of firearm defenses from 1987-1990, 1993-2005, 2007-2015, and 2016-2021.
- Defined firearm defense as victims using a gun to threaten or attack an offender.
Main Results:
- Average annual DGU ranged between 61,000 and 65,000 incidents across all crime types.
- Personal (violent) incidents accounted for 38,000-53,000 annually, while household (property) incidents were 12,000-23,000 annually.
- DGU remained relatively low and constant over the 35-year study period.
Conclusions:
- Defensive gun use by US crime victims is infrequent and has not significantly changed over time.
- The study's findings challenge the notion that widespread firearm ownership provides substantial protective benefits.
- The relative rarity of DGU suggests a need for critical evaluation of public health claims regarding firearm prevalence.
Related Concept Videos
Bullying
Bystander Effect
Aggression

