Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Intrathecal Application of a Fluorescent Dye for the Identification of Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks in Cochlear Malformation
Published on: February 29, 2020
Managing Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak After Lumbar Spinal Fusion: When Conservative Treatment is Not the Answer?
Alejandro Pando1, Gabriel Hanna2, Robert Kamil3
1Department of Neurological Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA.
Objective:
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks are a known complication of lumbar fusion surgery. There is a scarcity of literature describing the management of this complication. The aim of this study was to identify patients who are at risk of requiring further intervention for managing CSF leaks.
Methods:
The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was used to identify patients who had lumbar fusion in the United States from 2002 to 2014. Inpatient outcomes including the incidence and risk factors for requiring an intervention were calculated. Secondary outcomes including average length of stay, mean cost, and mortality rates were calculated. All statistical analyses were conducted based on multivariate regression models using the SPSS software.
Results:
A total of 11,636 patients with postoperative CSF leak after elective lumbar fusion were identified in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database from 2002 to 2014. Of these patients, 79.9% (9294/11,636) required an advanced intervention including epidural blood patch, simple repair, or operative management. There was an increase of 13% per year in the use of an intervention in managing CSF leaks. After controlling for several confounding factors, independent risk factors for requiring an intervention included older age (OR: 1.01; 95% CI: 1.005-1.013; P < 0.0001), lateral approach (OR: 1.52; 95% CI: 1.26-1.81; P < 0.0001) and posterior approach (OR: 1.60; 95% CI: 1.34-1.91; P < 0.0001) compared to anterior approach. Nonsurgical treatment was associated with increased length of stay (5.93 ± 4.61 vs. 5.25 ± 3.63; P < 0.0001) with similar hospitalization costs (119,537.2 ± 89,045.6 vs. 120,277.9 ±87,894.1; P = 0.72) and mortality (0.3% vs. 0.3%; P > 0.05).
Conclusions:
Spine surgeons should be aware of certain patient and procedure-specific characteristics that increase the risk of requiring an intervention for CSF leak management after lumbar fusion to improve patient outcomes.
More Related Videos
05:17Author Spotlight: Scope of LE-ULBD as a Safe, Effective, and Minimally Invasive Approach to Treat Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Published on: February 9, 2024
04:33Spinal Hernia Repair and Cauda Equina Repositioning After Lumbar Decompression under Three-Dimensional Microscopy: A Case Report and Literature Review
Published on: November 8, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Brain Abscess l: Introduction