Meta-Analysis of Physiology-Guided Complete or Culprit Lesion-Only Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Myocardial
Sahib Singh1, Udaya S Tantry2, Kevin Bliden2
1Department of Medicine, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland.
Insights
Physiology-guided complete revascularization significantly reduces cardiovascular death and repeat procedures in heart attack patients with multivessel disease compared to culprit-only PCI. This approach offers improved outcomes for myocardial infarction management.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Multivessel disease in myocardial infarction (MI) poses treatment challenges.
- The optimal revascularization strategy, complete versus culprit-lesion-only percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), remains debated.
- Physiological guidance for complete revascularization is a key area of investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of physiology-guided complete revascularization versus culprit lesion-only PCI in patients with MI and multivessel disease.
- To evaluate the impact of these strategies on mortality, repeat revascularization, and other adverse events.
- To provide evidence-based recommendations for revascularization in complex coronary artery disease.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
- Inclusion of studies comparing physiology-guided complete revascularization with culprit lesion-only PCI in MI patients.
- Analysis of outcomes including all-cause death, cardiovascular death, repeat revascularization, MI, stent thrombosis, and contrast-associated nephropathy/acute kidney injury.
Main Results:
- A total of 4,849 patients were included in the meta-analysis.
- Physiology-guided complete revascularization was associated with significant reductions in cardiovascular death (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.54-0.97, p=0.03) and repeat revascularizations (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.38-0.66, p<0.00001).
- No significant differences were observed in all-cause death, MI, stent thrombosis, or contrast-associated nephropathy/acute kidney injury between the two strategies.
Conclusions:
- Physiology-guided complete revascularization is superior to culprit lesion-only PCI in reducing cardiovascular death and the need for repeat revascularization in patients with MI and multivessel disease.
- This strategy offers a significant benefit for managing complex coronary artery disease.
- Further research may explore long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness.
Abstract:
Whether physiology-guided complete revascularization of nonculprit lesions is superior to culprit lesion-only percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) and multivessel disease remains debated. Online databases were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing physiology-guided complete revascularization and culprit lesion-only PCI in patients with MI. The outcomes of interest were all-cause death, cardiovascular (CV) death, repeat revascularization, MI, stent thrombosis, and contrast-associated nephropathy/acute kidney injury. Pooled odds ratios, along with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. A total of 4,849 patients (n = 2,288 physiology-guided complete revascularization, n = 2,561 culprit lesion-only PCI) were included. The mean age was 66 years and 76% were men. At a mean follow-up of 2.5 years, physiology-guided complete revascularization was associated with significant reductions in CV death (odds ratio 0.72, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.97, p = 0.03) and repeat revascularizations (0.50, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.66, p <0.00001) compared with culprit lesion-only PCI. There were no differences between the 2 approaches in all-cause death (0.91, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.19, p = 0.50), MI (0.85, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.21, p = 0.36), stent thrombosis (1.24, 95% CI 0.58 to 2.69, p = 0.58), and contrast-associated nephropathy/acute kidney injury (1.07, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.31, p = 0.50). In conclusion, among patients with MI and multivessel disease, physiology-guided complete revascularization was associated with significant reductions in CV death and revascularizations compared with culprit lesion-only PCI.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Angina IV: Management
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care


