Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2025

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
The academic impact of paediatric research agendas: a descriptive analysis
L Postma1, M L Luchtenberg2, A A E Verhagen2
1University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Beatrix Children's Hospital, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, 9713 GZ, The Netherlands. l.postma@umcg.nl.
Insights
Researchers developed a method to assess the academic impact of child-led paediatric research agendas. This analysis of 31 agendas revealed their citation impact and the traceability of resulting studies.
Area of Science:
- Paediatric Research
- Health Sciences Research
- Research Impact Assessment
Background:
- Growing involvement of children and young people in designing paediatric research agendas.
- Limited existing reports on the academic impact of child-informed research agendas.
- The critical need to understand the influence of research agendas co-designed with children.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a novel method for describing the academic impact of paediatric research agendas.
- To evaluate the academic impact of research agendas co-developed with children and young people.
Main Methods:
- Adapted frameworks like the Research Impact Framework and Payback Framework.
- Introduced the Descriptive Academic Impact Analysis of Paediatric Research Agendas (DAIA-PRA) method.
- Utilized five steps: agenda identification, citation analysis, impact analysis, author assessment, and traceability classification.
Main Results:
- Analyzed 31 paediatric research agendas co-designed with children and young people.
- These agendas received 517 citations, with 131 (25%) new studies directly based on agenda priorities.
- Study traceability was categorized as easy (34%), medium (47%), or difficult (19%).
Conclusions:
- Successfully developed and applied a method to assess the academic impact of paediatric research agendas.
- Provided insights into the academic impact of 31 child-involved research agendas.
- Recommended integrating impact-tracing mechanisms into future paediatric research agenda design.
Background:
Increasingly, researchers are involving children and young people in designing paediatric research agendas, but as far as we were able to determine, only one report exists on the academic impact of such an agenda. In our opinion, the importance of insight into the impact of research agendas designed together with children and young people cannot be overstated. The first aim of our study was therefore to develop a method to describe the academic impact of paediatric research agendas. Our second aim was to describe the academic impact of research agendas developed by involving children and young people.
Methods:
We based our method on aspects of the Research Impact Framework developed by Kuruvilla and colleagues and the Payback Framework developed by Donovan and Hanney. We named it Descriptive Academic Impact Analysis of Paediatric Research Agendas, consisting of five steps: [1] Identification of paediatric research agendas, [2] Citation analysis, [3] Impact analysis, [4] Author assessment, and [5] Classification of the ease of determining traceability.
Results:
We included 31 paediatric research agendas that were designed by involving children and young people. These agendas were cited 517 times, ranging from 0 to 71 citations. A total of 131 new studies (25%) were published, ranging from 0 to 23 per paediatric research agenda, based on at least one of the research priorities from the agenda. Sixty studies (46%) were developed by at least one of the first, second, or last authors of the paediatric research agenda on which the studies were based. Based on their accessibility and the ease with which we could identify the studies as being agenda-based, we categorised 44 studies (34%) as easy, 62 studies (47%) as medium, and 25 studies (19%) as difficult to identify.
Conclusion:
This study reports on the development of a method to describe the academic impact of paediatric research agendas and it offers insight into the impact of 31 such agendas. We recommend that our results be used as a guide for designing future paediatric research agendas, especially by including ways of tracing the academic impact of new studies concerning the agendas' research priorities.
Related Concept Videos
EPS and iPS Cells in Disease Research
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and Symptoms
To diagnose ADHD, symptoms must manifest before age 12 and be evident across multiple settings....
Ethics in Research
Genomic Imprinting and Inheritance
The expression of some genes depends on which parent passed the gene to the offspring, through a phenomenon known as...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

