Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Language and Cognition01:27

Language and Cognition

336
Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.
336
Components of Language01:24

Components of Language

257
Language, whether spoken, signed, or written, consists of specific components: lexicon and grammar. The lexicon is the vocabulary of a language, comprising its words. Grammar is the set of rules used to convey meaning through the lexicon. For example, English grammar adds “-ed” to most verbs to indicate past tense. Words are formed by combining phonemes, which are the basic sound units of a language. Different languages have different sets of phonemes (e.g., “ah” vs.
257
Language Development01:22

Language Development

327
Children master language quickly and with relative ease, supported by both biological predisposition and reinforcement. B. F. Skinner (1957) proposed that language is learned through reinforcement, while Noam Chomsky (1965) argued that language acquisition mechanisms are biologically determined.
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
327
Lateralization01:28

Lateralization

314
Brain lateralization refers to the division of mental processes and functions between the two hemispheres of the brain, a phenomenon that optimizes neural efficiency and underpins complex abilities in humans. This specialization allows each hemisphere to perform tasks where it has a comparative advantage, facilitating more refined cognitive capabilities across different domains.
314
Constraints and Statical Determinacy01:26

Constraints and Statical Determinacy

585
In structural engineering, the equilibrium of a system is not only determined by its equations of equilibrium but also with the help of constraints. Constraints refer to restrictions on the motion of a system. The proper combinations of constraints can minimize the total number of constraints needed to maintain a system in mechanical equilibrium. When this happens, the system is said to be statically determinate. For such systems, the unknown reaction supports can be estimated using equilibrium...
585
Higher Mental Functions of the Brain: Language01:10

Higher Mental Functions of the Brain: Language

770
Language is a system of communication that allows the expression of thoughts, ideas, and feelings. The brain processes language in both hemispheres.
Language formation and comprehension take place in the dominant hemisphere. The dominant hemisphere is responsible for understanding the meaning of spoken, written, or sign language, as well as the ability to communicate. For most people, the left hemisphere is the dominant one. The right hemisphere, then, gives tone and emotional context to the...
770

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bilingual representation of multi-word phrases: Evidence from phrase-acceptability judgment in Chinese-English bilinguals.

Cognition·2026
Same author

The role of explicit contextual truth in counterfactual reasoning: ERP evidence from Chinese.

Brain and language·2026
Same author

Why do self-referent cues facilitate mathematical word problem-solving? Insights from eye tracking.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Language choice and naming difficulty: Evidence from bilingual degraded picture naming.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same author

The Mechanistic Framework of Alignment: A Unified Model.

Cognitive science·2025
Same author

The role of semantics and phonology in bilingual picture naming: Evidence from the phono-translation effect.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 12, 2025

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks
08:32

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks

Published on: September 5, 2019

5.6K

Lexically-specific syntactic restrictions in second-language speakers.

Mariana Vega-Mendoza1,2, Iva Ivanova3, Janet F McLean4

  • 1Psychology, Department of Health, Education, and Technology, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden.

Journal of Memory and Language
|September 20, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Second language (L2) English speakers learn verb syntax through statistical learning within English, not by generalizing from their first language (L1). This applies to both abstract structures and lexically-specific information.

Keywords:
L2 processingstructural primingsyntactic restrictionsungrammatical sentences

More Related Videos

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning
05:33

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning

Published on: January 29, 2020

6.0K
Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

15.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 12, 2025

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks
08:32

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks

Published on: September 5, 2019

5.6K
Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning
05:33

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning

Published on: January 29, 2020

6.0K
Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

15.7K

Area of Science:

  • Psycholinguistics
  • Second Language Acquisition
  • Computational Linguistics

Background:

  • Understanding how second language (L2) speakers acquire complex syntactic structures is crucial for language acquisition theories.
  • Investigating the roles of first language (L1) generalization versus L2 statistical learning in L2 syntax development.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine how highly proficient, immersed L2 English speakers represent lexically-specific syntactic restrictions of English verbs.
  • To differentiate between L1 generalization and L2 statistical learning as mechanisms for acquiring syntactic knowledge.

Main Methods:

  • Two structural priming experiments were conducted with L2 English speakers (Germanic and Romance L1s).
  • Participants were primed to produce dispreferred double-object structures with non-alternating dative verbs.
  • Priming effects were analyzed based on prime type (ungrammatical vs. grammatical) and verb properties.

Main Results:

  • L2 speakers showed priming effects supporting abstract statistical learning within English (L2).
  • No significant differences were observed between speakers with Germanic vs. Romance L1s, contradicting L1 generalization predictions.
  • A 'lexical boost' effect indicated stronger priming from lexically-specific primes, suggesting lexically-driven learning.

Conclusions:

  • Highly proficient L2 speakers' syntactic representations are primarily shaped by statistical learning within the L2, encompassing both abstract and lexically-specific patterns.
  • Generalization from the L1 does not appear to be a significant factor in acquiring lexically-specific syntactic restrictions for these L2 speakers.
  • Findings highlight the power of L2-internal statistical learning in developing nuanced grammatical knowledge.