Effectiveness of Direct Admission Compared to Admission Through the Emergency Department: A Stepped-Wedge

JoAnna K Leyenaar1,2, Stephanie C Acquilano2, Seneca D Freyleue2

  • 1Dartmouth Health, Lebanon, New Hampshire.

Pediatrics
|September 20, 2024
PubMed

Insights

Direct admission (DA) for children reduces emergency department (ED) visits. While initial assessment may be slightly slower, DA significantly speeds up therapeutic management and is safe for patients.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Healthcare Management
  • Hospital Operations
  • Patient Flow Optimization

Background:

  • Direct admission (DA) programs aim to reduce emergency department (ED) utilization by streamlining hospital admissions.
  • Implementing DA can bypass the traditional ED admission process, potentially improving efficiency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of a voluntary direct admission (DA) program on the timeliness of care, family experience, and clinical outcomes in children.
  • To compare outcomes for children admitted via DA versus the traditional ED route.

Main Methods:

  • A stepped-wedge design was employed, randomizing 69 clinics to implement a DA program between February 2020 and April 2023.
  • Outcomes for 2599 children under 18 with common medical diagnoses were compared between DA and ED admissions using adjusted regression analyses.

Main Results:

  • Direct admission was associated with a modest increase in time to initial clinical assessment (3.1 minutes longer).
  • However, direct admission significantly reduced time to initial therapeutic management by an average of 49.6 minutes.
  • No significant differences were observed in time to diagnostic testing or rates of post-admission clinical deterioration.

Conclusions:

  • Direct admission (DA) is a safe and acceptable alternative to emergency department (ED) admission for pediatric patients.
  • DA offers a potential benefit by accelerating therapeutic management, despite a slight delay in initial assessment.
Abstract