Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2025

08:49
External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?
Published on: June 6, 2020
14.5K
Distance Traveled for Abortion at a North Carolina Tertiary Care Center Following Restrictive Legislation
Tara Brenner1, Gretchen S Stuart1, Carly A Rowe1
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UNC School of Medicine.
North Carolina Medical Journal
|September 20, 2024
Summary
Despite North Carolina
Area of Science:
- Reproductive Health
- Public Health Policy
- Healthcare Access
Background:
- North Carolina enacted 5 abortion restriction statutes between 2011 and 2016.
- Understanding the impact of these legislative changes on abortion access is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the proportion of women traveling over 25 miles for abortion care in 2011 versus 2017.
- To assess changes in travel distance and referral patterns before and after legislative restrictions.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of women obtaining abortions at University of North Carolina hospitals in 2011 and 2017.
- Data collected on residence, demographics, gestational age, parity, and referral source.
- Primary outcome: distance traveled from residence to the study center.
Main Results:
- 72% of women traveled >25 miles in 2011, compared to 75% in 2017.
- A higher percentage traveled >100 miles in 2017 (26%) vs. 2011 (20%).
- Increased referrals from neighboring states and freestanding abortion clinics were observed in 2017.
Conclusions:
- Similar proportions of women traveled over 25 miles for abortion care before and after legislative changes.
- Increased travel distances and shifts in referral patterns indicate a geographical burden on abortion access.
- Findings highlight potential impacts of strict abortion restrictions on patient travel and access.
Keywords:
OB-GYNTara BrennerUNCabortionabortion legislationnorth carolinaoriginal researchreproductive health
