Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength02:18

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength

9.1K
9.1K
Gibbs Free Energy02:39

Gibbs Free Energy

32.8K
One of the challenges of using the second law of thermodynamics to determine if a process is spontaneous is that it requires measurements of the entropy change for the system and the entropy change for the surroundings. An alternative approach involving a new thermodynamic property defined in terms of system properties only was introduced in the late nineteenth century by American mathematician Josiah Willard Gibbs. This new property is called the Gibbs free energy (G) (or simply the free...
32.8K
Nuclear Binding Energy02:13

Nuclear Binding Energy

12.3K
The difference between the calculated and experimentally measured masses is known as the mass defect of the atom. In the case of helium-4, the mass defect indicates a “loss” in mass of 4.0331 amu – 4.0026 amu = 0.0305 amu. The loss in mass accompanying the formation of an atom from protons, neutrons, and electrons is due to the conversion of that mass into energy that is evolved as the atom forms. The nuclear binding energy is the energy produced when the atoms’ nucleons...
12.3K
Calculating Standard Free Energy Changes02:49

Calculating Standard Free Energy Changes

20.8K
The free energy change for a reaction that occurs under the standard conditions of 1 bar pressure and at 298 K is called the standard free energy change. Since free energy is a state function, its value depends only on the conditions of the initial and final states of the system. A convenient and common approach to the calculation of free energy changes for physical and chemical reactions is by use of widely available compilations of standard state thermodynamic data. One method involves the...
20.8K
Free Energy and Equilibrium00:55

Free Energy and Equilibrium

6.1K
The free energy change for a process may be viewed as a measure of its driving force. A negative value for ΔG represents a driving force for the process in the forward direction, while a positive value represents a driving force for the process in the reverse direction. When ΔG is zero, the forward and reverse driving forces are equal, and the process occurs in both directions at the same rate (the system is at equilibrium).
The reaction quotient, Q, is a convenient measure of the...
6.1K
Free Energy01:21

Free Energy

47.9K
Free energy—abbreviated as G for the scientist Gibbs who discovered it—is a measurement of useful energy that can be extracted from a reaction to do work. It is the energy in a chemical reaction that is available after entropy is accounted for. Reactions that take in energy are considered endergonic and reactions that release energy are exergonic. Plants carry out endergonic reactions by taking in sunlight and carbon dioxide to produce glucose and oxygen. Animals, in turn, break...
47.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Application of Language Models for the Analysis of Adverse Drug Events in Pharmaceutical Research and Development: Scoping Review.

JMIR AI·2026
Same author

Structural and dynamic basis of indirect apoptosis inhibition by Bcl-xL: A case study with Bid.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

CryptoBank: A resource for the identification and prediction of cryptic sites in proteins.

Science advances·2026
Same author

Exploring the Structural Basis of Cryptic Pocket Formation Driven by Extensive Protein Conformational Changes in Drug Targets.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same author

A Transferable and Robust Computational Framework for Class A GPCR Activation Free Energies.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2026
Same author

Molecular basis of mitogen-activated protein kinase ERK2 activation by its upstream kinase MEK1.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Linking Local Water Electrostatic Potentials to Measured Hydrogen Evolution Onset in Aqueous Electrolytes.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2026
Same journal

Microsolvation Redirects Electron-Induced Chemistry in Nucleobases.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2026
Same journal

Interfacial Microenvironment Effects on the Mechanism of Photocatalytic Methanol Conversion for Hydrogen Evolution.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2026
Same journal

Noncovalent Interactions in Protein-Ti Binding: Titan Bonds at Work.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2026
Same journal

Partial Phase Remixing of Segregated Mixed Halide Perovskite Nanocrystals Induced by an Instant Change in an External Electric Field.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2026
Same journal

Pressure-Driven Dissociation of a Kr Clathrate in the Presence of Colloids.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 12, 2025

Molecular Spring Constant Analysis by Biomembrane Force Probe Spectroscopy
08:10

Molecular Spring Constant Analysis by Biomembrane Force Probe Spectroscopy

Published on: November 20, 2021

3.0K

Absolute Binding Free Energies with OneOPES.

Maurice Karrenbrock1,2,3, Alberto Borsatto1,2,3, Valerio Rizzi1,2,3

  • 1School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Geneva, Rue Michel-Servet 1, CH-1206 Geneva, CH.

The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
|September 20, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Calculating protein-ligand binding free energies is challenging. A new OneOPES enhanced sampling strategy accurately predicts binding affinities, aiding drug discovery and mechanism studies.

More Related Videos

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
10:29

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

Published on: May 9, 2025

461
Measuring Biomolecular DSC Profiles with Thermolabile Ligands to Rapidly Characterize Folding and Binding Interactions
09:15

Measuring Biomolecular DSC Profiles with Thermolabile Ligands to Rapidly Characterize Folding and Binding Interactions

Published on: November 21, 2017

8.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 12, 2025

Molecular Spring Constant Analysis by Biomembrane Force Probe Spectroscopy
08:10

Molecular Spring Constant Analysis by Biomembrane Force Probe Spectroscopy

Published on: November 20, 2021

3.0K
Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
10:29

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

Published on: May 9, 2025

461
Measuring Biomolecular DSC Profiles with Thermolabile Ligands to Rapidly Characterize Folding and Binding Interactions
09:15

Measuring Biomolecular DSC Profiles with Thermolabile Ligands to Rapidly Characterize Folding and Binding Interactions

Published on: November 21, 2017

8.3K

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry
  • Molecular dynamics simulations
  • Drug discovery

Background:

  • Calculating absolute binding free energies (ABFEs) for protein-ligand systems is crucial but historically challenging.
  • Recent advancements in force fields and algorithms have improved ABFE calculation quality, yet accuracy for drug discovery remains a hurdle.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a transferable enhanced sampling strategy for accurate ABFE calculations of protein-ligand systems.
  • To validate the strategy using the OneOPES (One-particle Excitation Sampling) method with simple geometric collective variables.
  • To assess the strategy's performance on diverse ligands and protein targets relevant to drug discovery.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the OneOPES enhanced sampling method combined with geometric collective variables.
  • Applied the strategy to BRD4 and Hsp90 protein targets with 17 diverse ligands (fragments and drug-like molecules).
  • Compared calculated binding free energies against experimental data and assessed sampling of binding modes and structural consistency.

Main Results:

  • Achieved high accuracy in predicting protein-ligand binding affinities, with a mean unsigned error < 1 kcal mol⁻¹ compared to experimental values.
  • Demonstrated the strategy's transferability across different protein targets and ligands without system-specific collective variable tuning.
  • Showcased effective sampling of various ligand binding modes and consistent reproduction of experimentally determined structures from varied initial configurations.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed OneOPES strategy offers an accurate and transferable approach for calculating protein-ligand ABFEs.
  • This method can significantly inform lead optimization campaigns in drug discovery by providing reliable binding affinity predictions.
  • The strategy facilitates deeper understanding of protein-ligand binding and unbinding mechanisms.