Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

38.9K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
38.9K
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

5.2K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
5.2K
Cultural Influences on Personality01:26

Cultural Influences on Personality

132
Individualist and collectivist cultures emphasize different core values, shaping personality in distinct ways. In individualist cultures, such as those in the United States, England, and Australia, people prioritize independence, competition, and personal achievement. These societies tend to promote self-focused traits, with individuals often reporting higher levels of self-esteem. In contrast, collectivist cultures, commonly found in regions like Asia, Africa, and South America, emphasize...
132
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

27.6K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.6K
Incentive Theory: Pull Theory of Motivation01:18

Incentive Theory: Pull Theory of Motivation

396
Incentive theory, or the "pull theory" of motivation, suggests that external rewards primarily drive behavior. Individuals are motivated to engage in activities when they anticipate a desirable outcome. This is why people often work hard for promotions or study intensively to achieve high grades. These incentives can be tangible, physical rewards such as money or promotions, or intangible, non-physical rewards like praise and social recognition.
The theory differentiates between...
396
Self-Discrepancy Theory02:45

Self-Discrepancy Theory

18.3K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.  
18.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Communicating Time-to-Event Treatment Effects in Randomized Trials: A Randomized Experiment among General Practitioners.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2026
Same author

Asymmetrical social copying drives behavioural cascades following a shock event.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2026
Same author

Erratum: Impediments to countering racist pseudoscience - CORRIGENDUM.

Evolutionary human sciences·2025
Same author

Impediments to countering racist pseudoscience.

Evolutionary human sciences·2025
Same author

Author Correction: Adaptive mechanisms of social and asocial learning in immersive collective foraging.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Adaptive mechanisms of social and asocial learning in immersive collective foraging.

Nature communications·2025
Same journal

The TaMYB55-TaSnRK1α1-TabZIP9 module confers heat stress tolerance in wheat.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Superstatistics approach to turbulent circulation fluctuations.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

A molecular timescale for evolution of cobamide biosynthesis.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Pierre Chambon, a pioneer of molecular biology and gene regulation in eukaryotes.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Granulosa cell glycogen fuels the avascular corpus luteum.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Synthetic essentiality of TRAIL/TNFSF10 in VHL-deficient renal cell carcinoma.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 12, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

649

Humans flexibly integrate social information despite interindividual differences in reward.

Alexandra Witt1, Wataru Toyokawa2,3, Kevin N Lala4

  • 1Human and Machine Cognition Lab, University of Tübingen, Tübingen 72074, Germany.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
|September 20, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Human social learning is more flexible than previously thought. A new model shows people can learn from others even with different goals, integrating social information realistically.

Keywords:
computational modelingevolutionary simulationsexplorationgeneralizationsocial learning

More Related Videos

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.3K
Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans
12:09

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans

Published on: March 19, 2014

23.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 12, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

649
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.3K
Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans
12:09

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans

Published on: March 19, 2014

23.2K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Behavioral Economics
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • Human social learning research has advanced, incorporating social information into reinforcement learning.
  • Previous models often assume identical payoffs, limiting realism in diverse social interactions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a more realistic model of social learning that accounts for payoff differences between individuals.
  • To investigate the flexibility of human social learning in integrating diverse social information.

Main Methods:

  • Introduced a socially correlated bandit task to simulate realistic payoff variations.
  • Developed and tested the Social Generalization (SG) model using evolutionary simulations and online experiments.

Main Results:

  • The SG model outperformed existing models in predicting social learning behavior.
  • Found that social information is treated as noisier than individual observations in the SG model.
  • Evidence suggests a resource-rational trade-off where social learning can substitute for individual exploration.

Conclusions:

  • Human social learning is highly flexible, adapting to varying social contexts and individual differences.
  • The SG model provides a more accurate framework for understanding how humans integrate social information from diverse sources.
  • This research opens new avenues for studying adaptive social learning strategies in complex environments.