Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 3, 2026
Proximal Cadaveric Femur Preparation for Fracture Strength Testing and Quantitative CT-based Finite Element Analysis
Published on: March 11, 2017
The biomechanical assessment of two stemless shoulder arthroplasty prostheses in uniformly poor-quality bone mineral
Ahmad Hedayatzadeh Razavi1, Nazanin Nafisi1, Isabella Stewart2
1Musculoskeletal Translational Innovation Initiative, Carl J. Shapiro Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Mechanical Engineering Department, Boston University, Boston, USA.
Background:
Stemless shoulder arthroplasty offers several advantages, such as preserving bone stock and reducing periprosthetic fracture risk. However, implant motion can deter osteointegration and increase bone resorption, where micromotion less than 0.150 mm is crucial for bony ingrowth and vital to the success of the implant. The interaction between the implant and the metaphyseal bone and its effects on stability remains unclear. Therefore, this cadaveric study aims to assess the immediate stability of two stemless prostheses in low bone density specimens.
Methods:
Twenty cadaveric shoulders were used to compare the stability of two stemless shoulder implants by Zimmer-Biomet (model A) and Exactech (model B), subjected to loads of 220 N, 520 N, and 820 N to assess strain and micromotion.
Findings:
Micromotion at 220 N load was 0.061 ± 0.080 mm and 0.053 ± 0.050 mm, and at 520 N load, 0.279 ± 0.37 mm and 0.311 ± 0.35 mm for models A and B, respectively. The estimated mean force required to achieve a 150 μm micromotion was 356 ± 116 N and 315 ± 61 N for models A and B, respectively. Motion analysis revealed distinct movement patterns for each implant, with model B demonstrating better force distribution on the bone despite no significance.
Interpretation:
Forces over 520 N (high postoperative rehabilitation force) could hinder bone integration with prostheses due to excessive micromotion. Conversely, forces around 220 N (preconditioning loading force) are considered safe for prosthesis stability even with low bone density. These insights may caution against using stemless implants when bone density is low, and help guide clinical decisions on the duration of rehabilitation and sling use after stemless arthroplasty.
