Identification and Treatment of Lung Cancer Oncogenic Drivers in a Diverse Safety Net Setting

  • 0John Peter Smith Oncology and Infusion Center, Fort Worth, TX; Department of Internal Medicine, Burnett School of Medicine at Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, TX.

|

|

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Molecular testing for EGFR and ALK alterations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is increasing in diverse populations. Identifying these oncogenic drivers through testing is linked to improved survival outcomes for patients with NSCLC.

Area Of Science

  • Oncology
  • Molecular Diagnostics
  • Health Disparities

Background

  • Advances in targeted therapies for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have improved patient outcomes.
  • Limited data exists on molecular testing and treatment patterns across diverse patient populations with NSCLC.

Purpose Of The Study

  • To investigate the patterns of EGFR and ALK testing and treatment in a diverse NSCLC patient cohort.
  • To assess the association between molecular testing and survival in this population.

Main Methods

  • Retrospective study of 220 diverse patients treated at a safety net healthcare system.
  • Analysis of blood and tissue-based testing for EGFR and ALK alterations.
  • Cox proportional-hazards regression models to evaluate the impact of testing on survival.

Main Results

  • EGFR and ALK testing rates increased significantly from 2017 to 2021.
  • EGFR alterations were most frequent in Asian patients (45%); ALK alterations were highest in Hispanic (13%) and Asian (11%) patients.
  • Lack of testing was associated with worse survival, while testing positive for EGFR or ALK alterations correlated with improved survival.

Conclusions

  • Molecular testing for oncogenic mutations like EGFR and ALK in NSCLC is feasible across all race-ethnicity groups.
  • Identification of actionable mutations (EGFR, ALK) is associated with improved survival outcomes in NSCLC patients.