Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2025

09:52
Accurate and Simple Evaluation of Vascular Anastomoses in Monochorionic Placenta using Colored Dye
Published on: September 5, 2011
26.8K
Low placenta at the mid trimester anomaly scan-A cause for concern?
1Department of Fetal Medicine, Fernandez Hospital, Hyderabad, India.
Journal of Clinical Ultrasound : JCU
|September 20, 2024
Summary
Internal os distance (IOD) measured during mid-trimester scans can help predict third-trimester placental position. Most low-lying placentas in early scans resolve by the third trimester, indicating IOD
Area of Science:
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Fetal Medicine
- Diagnostic Imaging
Background:
- Accurate prediction of third-trimester placental location is crucial for managing pregnancy complications.
- Internal os distance (IOD) is a sonographic measurement evaluated in the mid-trimester.
- Understanding factors associated with abnormal placental positioning is essential for clinical practice.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the predictive accuracy of mid-trimester internal os distance (IOD) for identifying third-trimester low-positioned placentas.
- To establish specific IOD cut-off values for predicting third-trimester placental location.
- To investigate the association of placental site (anterior/posterior) and prior cesarean section history with third-trimester placental position, and to assess maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A prospective cohort study included women with low-positioned placentas (IOD < 20 mm) identified during mid-trimester anomaly scans.
- Participants were followed until birth, with third-trimester placental location assessed.
- Relative risks (RR) were calculated for posterior vs. anterior placentas, placenta previa vs. low-lying placenta, and previous cesarean section history. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and likelihood ratios were used to determine IOD cut-offs.
Main Results:
- A significantly higher risk of third-trimester low-positioned placenta was observed in women with posterior placentas (9.28% vs. 0.74%, RR 1.45) compared to anterior placentas.
- Women with placenta previa showed a substantially higher risk (68.57% vs. 1.69%, RR 6.51) than those with low-lying placentas.
- A history of cesarean section also correlated with an increased risk (9.41% vs. 5.87%, RR 1.47).
Conclusions:
- The majority of placentas identified as low-positioned in the mid-trimester (93.42%) were normally situated by the third trimester.
- Specific IOD cut-off values were identified: -40 mm for anterior placentas and 14.3 mm for posterior placentas.
- IOD measurement shows promise as a tool for predicting third-trimester placental position, aiding in risk assessment and management.

